FootballFan
Striker
Off to praia de luz in august, I will find her.
Enjoy yer holiday, nice spot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Off to praia de luz in august, I will find her.
Enjoy yer holiday, nice spot.
Did you think so, I thought it was a bit dreary and the beach quite ordinary ..... OK for kids I suppose.
Never been actually but seen plenty of photos
I am not going to reply to all that, but it boils down to the fact that the Home secretary can ask any police force in the country to investigate something abroad. The met has more resources and has more expertise in this field.
Home office is funding the enquiry
...The met has more resources and has more expertise in this field....
Maddie was appointed a ward of court a couple of days after her disappearance, iirc.well then don't - but at same time then try not to sidetrack my posts 1032 and 1036 with utter nonsense?
total horseshite! unless you are some deluded misinformed Metpol fanboy?
If anything, you don't want the Met to have anything to do with any investigation or enquiry.... while point of my original post was to offer food for thought as to which numptie had selected them in an UNOFFICIAL enquiry.
The parents reside in Leicestershire... if the yellow notice was activated from a London or Metpol source then as long as you weren't a DAily Mail or Sky News type reporter it would be worthwhile trying to find out who's name is on that report? Because from London it can't be either parent as that would not be official procedure for any international enquiry where you would later require evidence.... unless somebody in London knows that in advance and is the point?
Maddie was appointed a ward of court a couple of days after her disappearance, iirc.
right from day one there was something about their (the parents) behaviour and the way they answered questions that didn't add up - IMO
not sure if anybody has brought this up, but the 'Gerry looking under cars' bit is also odd to say the least
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/madeleine-mccann-nanny-breaks-10-199719
in addition, and food for thought... why are the Met Police based in London taking the lead in this investigation from the UK side of things anyway? I thought both parents were based (work and residence) in Leicestershire? - so any missing persons report should officially have been reported through their local force and not the Met from London? (that's actually a simple fact according to procedure) - so who reported it from the UK end from London if it wasn't the parents? - this makes no sense whatsoever UNLESS it was an unofficial request from somebody else based in London?
well then don't - but at same time then try not to sidetrack my posts 1032 and 1036 with utter nonsense?
total horseshite! unless you are some deluded misinformed Metpol fanboy?
If anything, you don't want the Met to have anything to do with any investigation or enquiry.... while point of my original post was to offer food for thought as to which numptie had selected them in an UNOFFICIAL enquiry.
The parents reside in Leicestershire... if the yellow notice was activated from a London or Metpol source then as long as you weren't a DAily Mail or Sky News type reporter it would be worthwhile trying to find out who's name is on that report? Because from London it can't be either parent as that would not be official procedure for any international enquiry where you would later require evidence.... unless somebody in London knows that in advance and is the point?
Which then raises question, they don't seem to then spend that much time with their kids on their holiday then?
As for these evening sessions... a lot of alcohol on that bill from night she was reported missing? - a daily occurrence? or only by coincidence that one night during their entire stay?
I take it these questions have already been asked?
where do you get these ideas from. I suggest a new source
have a look
Home Office statement on Madeleine McCann - GOV.UK
a vague statement involving a previous government and the head of the Met (Stephenson)who was already preparing his resignation?
There is nothing official about that soundbite/new source you refer to here... The Met would have unofficially got involved as they often do with things, and in turn they have updated the Home Office who then post this update in 2011
Like I said, any half decent journalist should be able to obtain info from non-crime enquiries, and the yellow notice would have all official info... but I suspect there is no official request from the Metpol end, and now too late for certain people on UK side to admit that or put it right.
I bet joe publics buzzing for his holiday after reading this reviewIn which case I don't need to spare your feelings .... it's cheap & tacky and the town is endless dull whitewashed flats etc.
npia asked by Leicester police and PJ along with inspector from Leicester. which as I said, Leicester police had been involved
P.J. POLICE FILES: MARK HARRISON ROGATORY
also, just for info with this link... the statement has been translated, but appears to suggest that this Mark Harrison was a police agent or to some a police officer? He wasn't. He was a civvy or admin support staff - a forensics person that was sent over to assist Leicestershire Police Officers.
This was part of the request that came from Portugal to the UK
This had nothing to do with the Met at this stage.
Tedious maybe, but I can see nothing so far that the Met involvement has followed official channels.
I bet joe publics buzzing for his holiday after reading this review
Where has that come from?
the Ben Needham case blows your claims out of the water.Yes you are right every missing child is unique and every avenue should and must be investigated but in the majority of cases all leads are exhausted and the cases are closed or left on file.
You do realise what I mean when I say this case is unique. It is. If there is a chance that it can be solved it must be. If a new lead crops up then bugger the cost, look into it.
The same applies to any missing child investigation, if a new lead arises it must be investigated bugger the cost.