As he was all over the shop niceonemarra now has a reply ban on this thead.
As you were ladies and gentlemen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As he was all over the shop niceonemarra now has a reply ban on this thead.
As you were ladies and gentlemen.
You said at the beginning of the thread that the parents killing her was more plausible than any other theories. You've dismissed any attempts by anybody to say the parents didn't do it. Its obvious what you think but for some reason you don't just come out and say it
OK then, you are saying you don't think the parents killed her but you also say she wasn't abducted. So what do you think did happen?
Where's my aggression, you're paranoid mate.Just hang on there, you're really getting yourself wound up and making things up.
I'm not saying I believe the parents did or didn't kill her and I'm not saying she wasn't abducted ..... I have an open mind, why not try it instead of becoming all aggressive?
You've called me out for, 'The way you debunk any comment that they were not involved in their daughters death'.
As you claim I do this every time there must be many examples according to you.
So what you've done is to scurry off to find these examples to throw back in my face and prove your point ..... but failed.
And now, because you can't back up what you've said you decide that I didn't say it but you actually know what I'm thinking.
What you need to realise is that having a different opinion, on a subject, doesn't automatically mean you're 'debunking theories' otherwise both people would be equally guilty.
Those defending the parents seem to be quite confrontational, you're a typical example.
Just hang on there, you're really getting yourself wound up and making things up.
I'm not saying I believe the parents did or didn't kill her and I'm not saying she wasn't abducted ..... I have an open mind, why not try it instead of becoming all aggressive?
You've called me out for, 'The way you debunk any comment that they were not involved in their daughters death'.
As you claim I do this every time there must be many examples according to you.
So what you've done is to scurry off to find these examples to throw back in my face and prove your point ..... but failed.
And now, because you can't back up what you've said you decide that I didn't say it but you actually know what I'm thinking.
What you need to realise is that having a different opinion, on a subject, doesn't automatically mean you're 'debunking theories' otherwise both people would be equally guilty.
Those defending the parents seem to be quite confrontational, you're a typical example.
Where's my aggression, you're paranoid mate.
You don't have a different opinion you think the parents were involved. You are disagreeing with anybody who says they think she was abducted but aren't doing the same with the the McCann's did it mob. It shines out like a diamond in a goats arse what you think but for some strange reason you're not just saying what you think. Anyway I'll let you get back to your paranoia. Don't forget you owe pugwash an apology.
Here's an example below of your input so a bit less less of the holier than thou act, eh. Calling people loons isn't exactly an open mind you're trying to portray, we know you've made your mind up.
"It's the conspiracy nuts who really make me laugh with their ludicrous crackpot theories.
Some of the biggest loons make out a gang of men staked out the flat, meticulously recorded the movements of the parents, broke into the flat, kidnapped a child, carried her through a tourist resort, avoided all cctv/police/search party, smuggled her out of the country and flogged her to a desperate couple .....
..... all without leaving a footprint, fingerprint, hair or the slightest trace of DNA."
Your conduct in replying to those on this thread who don't think the parents were involved has been disgraceful.
Where's my aggression, you're paranoid mate.
You don't have a different opinion you think the parents were involved. You are disagreeing with anybody who says they think she was abducted but aren't doing the same with the the McCann's did it mob. It shines out like a diamond in a goats arse what you think but for some strange reason you're not just saying what you think. Anyway I'll let you get back to your paranoia. Don't forget you owe pugwash an apology.
Here's an example below of your input so a bit less less of the holier than thou act, eh. Calling people loons isn't exactly an open mind you're trying to portray, we know you've made your mind up.
"It's the conspiracy nuts who really make me laugh with their ludicrous crackpot theories.
Some of the biggest loons make out a gang of men staked out the flat, meticulously recorded the movements of the parents, broke into the flat, kidnapped a child, carried her through a tourist resort, avoided all cctv/police/search party, smuggled her out of the country and flogged her to a desperate couple .....
..... all without leaving a footprint, fingerprint, hair or the slightest trace of DNA."
Your conduct in replying to those on this thread who don't think the parents were involved has been disgraceful.
You don't want a debate ... you're just after an argument and I'm not interested.
Come back and try again when you've calmed down and stop trying to tell me what I think.
You even know what you think about what happened
You don't have a different opinion you think the parents were involved
I think they know something and i really hope it comes out one day.Devil's advocate here but if the McCann's are involved, all this publicity and fundraising they have received, will have them just below Hindley and Brady in the hatred stakes
Takes some doing to be so barefaced if they were involved in her death/disappearance
I would not want to be them, if and when it doesI think they know something and i really hope it comes out one day.
Disgraceful? That's way off the mark like. It's the mcfans who get all aggressive and resort to personal attacks against any opposing thought.
Plus we're not in the mccanns did it camp. We're in the we're not ruling it out camp. There's a big difference. That's what you lads can't get your head around.
They don't want debate of material mate. Just arguments and smokescreens. Cos if they did they'd soon see that not everything meets the eye with this case.
I think they know something and i really hope it comes out one day.
Scotland yard has a department that deals with foreign forces and acts as a link to Interpol, which all foreign enquiries must go through...
....The prime minister david Cameron asked the met to review and 2 years later Theresa may as home secretary gave the met permission to investiagate.....
52 pages of the same old shite
Yes, it's tiresome how people are putting various opinions and ideas on a message board.
I believe we should have more of your political threads where people always listen to the other side of the argument and change their minds if thereby persuaded.
Perhaps you should pop off and start another, the ones about Labour 30 years ago are particularly fascinating
Come back when I've posted 5,000 pages on that subject over ten years.
There really is nothing that hasn't already been said on this topic.
I take your point although it's not actually true, I've learned a few things and admitted as much.
Besides, there are people like me who rarely come on SMB and haven't posted on the previous thread/threads.
This thread is different in that it's a new appeal for funding from the police about a new line of enquiry.
I ignore your political threads as I have no interest .... couldn't you just do the same?