Some Random Guy
Striker
Surprise strap-on up the arse is worse than a sympathy shag like.Sympathy shags are the worst
A wank is better than a sympathy shag though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Surprise strap-on up the arse is worse than a sympathy shag like.Sympathy shags are the worst
We have sex often enough where I wouldn't have any suspicions based on a due date. Sorry about your sexless marriage.
I've heard this before, is it legitimate true or is it one of those cases like britain didn't officially outlaw slavery till 2010 or summit but there were other laws that covered every act of it?I think the law only changed about 20 years - it used to be legal for a man to rape his wife. Staggeringly.
I think it was the case that previously consent was implied by the act of marriage, particularly the use of obey as part of the marriage vows, therefore it wasn't technically classed as rape.I think the law only changed about 20 years - it used to be legal for a man to rape his wife. Staggeringly.
the wolf pack trial?Just seen the BBC report about what people consider rape. In particular the over 65s should be ashamed of themselves. But a lot of fucked up views across the board.
That said, the Spanish law is also fucked and in line with some of the views held in the report.
as daft as it sounds thats not too bad. I know a couple who regularly have her dressed as a schoolgirl, yet she is a teacher. I find that more creepySomeone once told me that him and his lass pretend she’s dead for a bit of ‘role play’. Should be arrested the sick fucks. Creepy bastards.
He’s also been a zombie.
I bet he was a bit gentler with you though.Hold on. Pressured into sex versus without consent is wildly different. I've felt pressured into having sex when I'm absolutely f***ing knackered. That isn't rape.
As a defence, it was used successfully in numerous cases until Regina vs R in 1990 reached the House of Lords after numerous appeals. They ruled unanimously that the idea of consent always existing via the marriage vows was outdated and overruled previous judgments to the contrary.I've heard this before, is it legitimate true or is it one of those cases like britain didn't officially outlaw slavery till 2010 or summit but there were other laws that covered every act of it?
What I mean is it wasn't just a technicality?
I've heard this before, is it legitimate true or is it one of those cases like britain didn't officially outlaw slavery till 2010 or summit but there were other laws that covered every act of it?
What I mean is it wasn't just a technicality?
"A survey commissioned by the End Violence Against Women Coalition found that a third of people in the UK think it isn’t usually rape if a woman is pressured into having sex but there is no physical violence"
Hmm the use of the word usually is strange here, makes me wonder how the question was framed, a fare question would not include the use of the word usually.
Wow, cheers for the info.As a defence, it was used successfully in numerous cases until Regina vs R in 1990 reached the House of Lords after numerous appeals. They ruled unanimously that the idea of consent always existing via the marriage vows was outdated and overruled previous judgments to the contrary.
The explicit illegality of rape within marriage wasn't officially enshrined in law until the Sexual Offences Act of 2001.
Just seen the BBC report about what people consider rape. In particular the over 65s should be ashamed of themselves. But a lot of fucked up views across the board.
That said, the Spanish law is also fucked and in line with some of the views held in the report.
Fuck me, if my lass said "I'm going to pretend I'm dead for a bit of role play", I'd be like nee bother pet and when she did it I'd fuck off to the pub without having to worry about what time I get home
Hold on. Pressured into sex versus without consent is wildly different. I've felt pressured into having sex when I'm absolutely f***ing knackered. That isn't rape.
1991 in England - R vs RI've heard this before, is it legitimate true or is it one of those cases like britain didn't officially outlaw slavery till 2010 or summit but there were other laws that covered every act of it?
What I mean is it wasn't just a technicality?
Ireland was ahead....1991 in England - R vs R
Ireland was 1990.
Nuts isn't it.Ireland was ahead....
Nuts isn't it.
That and others similar. There was one recently where a man and his nephew raped a girl they took out and got drunk. She said no over and over but because there was no physical threats, it's not rape. Wtf?