Yet ANOTHER school shooting in America

[Tiberius]

The media don't help the situation by making the shooter infamous, shouldn't show their face or name when reporting on it.

 

[HellsBells]

The media don't help the situation by making the shooter infamous, shouldn't show their face or name when reporting on it.

Well there’s an argument that says we need to know who’s doing this so we can tackle the cause. Although much like Isis, I’m also not sure what the solution is to teenage blerks who turn murerously angry when they don’t get laid, as seems to be the developing trend, sadly.

 

[Hair Flick]

Well there’s an argument that says we need to know who’s doing this so we can tackle the cause. Although much like Isis, I’m also not sure what the solution is to teenage blerks who turn murerously angry when they don’t get laid, as seems to be the developing trend, sadly.

Well the fairly obvious solution is to get them laid. Armed prossies, it's the way forward.

 

[Gucci Massive]

How can you tell he's a loser? He obviously is but he looks like a normal kid.

Logon or register to see this image

He looks like Joey Barton.

 

[Tex]

How much had your 401k gone up since Nov 2016?

Been on a steady incline since long before then but if we’re giving Trump credit for any incline since Nov 16 then he gets the blame for any subsequent deficits too.

 

[monkeytassle]

Been on a steady incline since long before then but if we’re giving Trump credit for any incline since Nov 16 then he gets the blame for any subsequent deficits too.

You're up more than you're down I'll give you a clue.

 

[Squat]

People are vetted properly.

I don’t know about other countries but I had to show where I’ll be securing them. I also had to take a firearms safety course. Being ex military that seemed like an attendance course, someone with no training would definitely benefit from it.

They should have tougher restrictions. The rules don’t seem to change at all after any shootings. Surely an investigation takes place and surely there should be tighter restrictions introduced afterwards

didnt this lad take his dad's guns? he was only 17. how are stricter checks going to stop this?

 

[gabbiadini1]

didnt this lad take his dad's guns? he was only 17. how are stricter checks going to stop this?

Well if his dad wasn’t allowed guns he wouldn’t have been able to take them would he.

 

[Epping]

didnt this lad take his dad's guns? he was only 17. how are stricter checks going to stop this?

not going to stop them but you can reduce them

 

[Tex]

You're up more than you're down I'll give you a clue.

And I’d be even further up if he kept his trap shut about trade, China, etc.

 

[Chop Buster]

Well if his dad wasn’t allowed guns he wouldn’t have been able to take them would he.

Unbelievable question

 

[Squat]

Well if his dad wasn’t allowed guns he wouldn’t have been able to take them would he.

so you arent allowed guns if you are planning to have kids in the future that end up having "issues".

 

[dangermows]

I'm starting to think kids are the issue here.

 

[gabbiadini1]

so you arent allowed guns if you are planning to have kids in the future that end up having "issues".

You don’t need guns full stop man

 

[safcforever]

didnt this lad take his dad's guns? he was only 17. how are stricter checks going to stop this?

Because his dad should be more responsible for his guns

I'm starting to think kids are the issue here.

Ban kids = no schools = no school shootings

You don’t need guns full stop man

Some people do. We use them for deer and pest control. Also to reduce the cayote numbers

 

[Bishop Mackem]

so you arent allowed guns if you are planning to have kids in the future that end up having "issues".

if you engage your brain, you can clearly see the point is that stricter controls would mean having a safe and secure place to store your guns. Thus, making it harder for anyone but the licence holder to gain access to these guns.

 

[GK]

dL on Twitter

The problem isn't guns - its compulsory education

 

[monkeytassle]

And I’d be even further up if he kept his trap shut about trade, China, etc.

Yeah but you wouldn't have been up as much in the last 18m if it wasn't for him. So your point is largely irrelevant. You're net net financially better off for trump as a wealthy White American.

 

[safcforever]

Yeah but you wouldn't have been up as much in the last 18m if it wasn't for him. So your point is largely irrelevant. You're net net financially better off for trump as a wealthy White American.

His complaint is basically “I want more money”

 

[Hair Flick]

Yeah but you wouldn't have been up as much in the last 18m if it wasn't for him. So your point is largely irrelevant. You're net net financially better off for trump as a wealthy White American.

That's opinion. How can you know what the economy would have done in any other circumstances, eg a Clinton victory?