Locke's SAFC
Striker
In a civil case to be found guilty it doesn't have to 'be beyond reasonable doubt' just on the 'balance of probability'
Yes, and I'd add that such was the emotion involved with the case it was difficult for Heron to get a fair trail. Wasn't his solicitor's shop firebombed? And, Heron wasn't there to defend himself.
I would have thought that whoever brutally murdered that little girl, considering the ferocity of the attack, there was a lot of rage involved in that; had either killed before or has killed since. I think we would have heard since of Heron had he been guilty.