Final home game against Cardiff. 13/14 season iirc. In 10th place.
69 minutes, mass walk out. Then came banner....... “This freakshow is not where NUFC is about”
You must be logged on to see external links
I did say make sure you had all your facts handy...
But you've missed a couple of things that are key details.
The context is crucial.
11/12 finished 5th.
12/13 finished 16th, safety only assured in the 37th game. Grounds for sacking right there.
Now here is the key bits that you haven't properly prepared your argument with.
Despite a disastrous 12/13 nearly getting relegated, there weren't major calls for his sacking. Then 13/14 started off ok, and we were up in 6th place for most of December. We won 5-1 against Stoke on boxing day.
Then over the next 18 games
before the Cardiff game, we lost 14 times, failing to score in 13 of those 18.
It was a long losing run similar to the one which had seen us shit the bed in 12/13. The calls for him to be sacked had started 3 games prior to Cardiff at home. We were 9th after the Cardiff game and finished 10th after the final game against Liverpool away.
In isolation 10th place looks decent, but the 18 months that preceded it are why the fans wanted him gone.
We didn't want him out because we thought we were better than that. He managed 10th due to winning the last game and everyone else f***ing up, we were pretty lucky to get that finish (tho I guess 10th is 10th over a season). He was on a downward spiral and losing the plot quickly here and we needed a change.
I actually know that. Sunderlands form plummeted in the back end of 10/11. I'm just using that 10th place in isolation to counter the same argument used against Newcastle fans.
Context is very important as to why a fanbase reacts how it does.