Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Length of the deal means nothing, why are you getting your knickers in a twist?
There are always clauses/targets in contracts, the length means nothing unless everything goes to plan.
Thats the point. It may not and massive severance will have to be paid. It also shows that he hasn't been a clear instruction to get us up this year.
Not many managers with any sense would accept a short term contract
Why would he? They want job security like anyone elseSurely an out of work one would?
im sure i saw that. when it was first on, i was sure it said 18 months.Said 18 months on the initial press release then changed to 2 1/2 years.
Tinpot from top to bottom
Not many managers with any sense would accept a short term contract
At a club like ours at this level??Not many managers with any sense would accept a short term contract
Very risky move giving him a 2 1/2 year contract imo. But I suppose you could argue that it shows they have faith in the appointment and view him as being someone who can take us forward in the championship. Where he has pretty much always failed.
Thats the point. It may not and massive severance will have to be paid. It also shows that he hasn't been a clear instruction to get us up this year.
OK, we get your point - you have made it on numerous threads. Maybe think of something else to talk about rather than repeating yourself.Parkinson. Just let that sink in.
12 managers in 10 years suggests the length of his contract is meaningless.
Lets just say I was a little shocked when I saw it as two and a half years on Sky this morning. Maybe he was covering his own back for compo. when sacked and refused to sign up for any less. Seems we were so desperate to get him...………..I could have understood a year and a half. Just.
The length of this deal has me baffled.