Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My post was perfectly polite, please let me know which part you consider 'out of order'.another keyboard warrior? the post you responded to was out of order as is yours.
My post was perfectly polite, please let me know which part you consider 'out of order'.
"Clown PM is silent". You also said someone was defending the indefensible.<<That's up to you, doesn't mean you are right or it's ok to abuse politicians or posters who don't agree.>>
I've abused nobody.
"Clown PM is silent". You also said someone was defending the indefensible.
If you think calling someone a clown or that they are defending the indefensible (thus calling them stupid by definition) is acceptable than that is on you.
Yet you called my post "out of order". Interesting
Given that I was the poster you originally quoted I’ll happily say I didn’t feel abused.The PM is a clown, and I didnt abuse any poster, if you think that post was abuse you are in dreamland.
You were out of order, no big deal nothing reported, move on.
Given that I was the poster you originally quoted I’ll happily say I didn’t feel abused.
Calling the PM a clown is definitely abuse tho so you’ve been correctly called out and made yourself look silly…again.
@Hull_Mackem was perfectly reasonably in his response to you, the problem is he put forward a coherent argument which you couldn’t respond to so you’ve resorted to this as usual.
I don’t feel you abused me. I do feel you abused the PM. You’ve avoided the more important point tho, you were given a perfectly reasonable and well articulated counter argument and instead of discussing is decided to play the victim as is your MO.You've basically just said I didnt hand out abuse then, so you are contradicting yourself.
As for calling the PM a clown I think we can all agree on that.
I don’t feel you abused me. I do feel you abused the PM. You’ve avoided the more important point tho, you were given a perfectly reasonable and well articulated counter argument and instead of discussing is decided to play the victim as is your MO.
You seem very keen to defend, the arguments you speak of are economic?
Because the govt have long given up the ol "following the science" argument
Nowt abusive or even impolite in that.Just because it's your opinion doesn't mean it is indefensible. In my experience of real humans in life, most people do not want any more restrictions than we have now, and they have perfectly valid reasons.
There are many reasons to not being in extra restrictions at present.
You feel you want them back in. That's up to you, doesn't mean you are right or it's ok to abuse politicians or posters who don't agree.
Nowt abusive or even impolite in that.
I give up. Your lack of self awareness is comical.nothing impolite about accusing a poster of being abusive to other posters?
haway man
Don’t blame me.Usual suspect degenerates a thread..
I wasn't.. usual suspect.. somebody with a history of crying fowlI give up. Your lack of self awareness is comical.
Don’t blame me.
I give up. Your lack of self awareness is comical.
Don’t blame me.
I wasn't.. usual suspect.. somebody with a history of crying fowl
Be better, less English hating localsThis seems to suggest that tests are needed from GB? Only NI that doesn’t need them?
Can I travel to Ireland from the UK? All the rules you need to know
Ireland has tightened its entry requirements for all visitorswww.independent.co.uk
A lad in work was due to fly over on Friday with 10 mates. All early 20s. They’re planning on just knocking it on the head and going to Wakefield instead Not sure it has the same charm as Dublin.
What the fuck.Well you kind of are to blame, trying to defend a poster who i accusing another poster of abuse is fine for you, completely wrong on so many levels.
What the fuck.
What is it you dont agree with?
I think the thread is derailed enough already, move on.
Why don’t you stop playing the victim for 5 minutes and respond to the pertinent points of the post you’ve irrationally taken offence to?