D
Deleted member 6694
Guest
They'll have a bit more to spend if they cash in on ASM, now that would be fun to watch
Few replies aren't happy with 50m. But I thought they just wanted the stadium washing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They'll have a bit more to spend if they cash in on ASM, now that would be fun to watch
Few replies aren't happy with 50m. But I thought they just wanted the stadium washing?
You do you got me banned for spelling it out yufcwNobody knows what that means
You’re right it isn’t the same as people’s jobs. It’s a completely different situation. The nufc followers can make the Saudis go away. Its one of those very rare opportunities for ordinary people to tell a despotic regime to do one. But money for players trumps morals up there.Yes the flags and tea towels was bad.
But I imagine if we stopped selling weapons and jobs were lost in Washington and Barrow and wherever then MPs would be down complaining about that.
Obviously football is not the same as people’s jobs but as a country we can either be fine taking Saudi money or not - saying it is ok for some but not others doesn’t wash with me.
But yeh, those waving flags etc might as well be out supporting the Taliban and ISIS.
I do recall BAE pulled sponsorship of t the Great Exhibition of the North after a campaign against them being involved, so I guess you do have a precedent for taking these issues on up there in fairness.
I thowt they just wanted their club back. Surely all this carry on hasn’t Been about money for players?
Few replies aren't happy with 50m. But I thought they just wanted the stadium washing?
But you read The Financial Times and have time to digest the dealings of governments. That's fair enough. Believe it or not there's still a bit of good old fashioned values up here. Yrs you probably think it's old hat, but there's still some of us that feel that everyone should have the right to fulfil their lives regardless of their backgrounds. Not be stamped on by the rich and have to fall into line.No, Cheltenham
No, no, I don't do that sort of thing and I mean that sincerely. Pathetic behaviour that sort of stuff.You do you got me banned for spelling it out yufcw
Get the buggers teltWhat's the expression then?
You've just answered your own question as to why NUFC are being singled out right now. Useful idiots waving SA flags, trying to deny the truth about their new owners. The other investments and trades have been criticised by plenty. The WC in Qatar was opposed by the vast majority of people.I completely agree it is sportswashing and the footage of fans waving Saudi flags was unpleasant. As much as I hate the idea of the Saudi state being involved in football ownership, my point is that I see no justification for singling out Newcastle ahead of all the other investment from and trade with the Saudis.
The fact England will be playing a world cup in stadia built by bonded labour slaves, hundreds (probably thousands by now) of who died on construction sites is equally abhorrent.
I got two points on me licence for doing that earlier. Not on this thread like.I agree, they aren't here to do anything other than cause trouble, I think it's time to ban the lot of them, its bad enough that we can't tell them to F**k off anymore.
Naff off.As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But it is and as long as our country is fine with that, and people are happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?
You do you got me banned for spelling it out yufcw
It's become apparent to me that sometimes the mods might make a decision off their own backs. I've never reported anyone in 20 years.Well someone did
They just want a team that tries. It's all they've ever wanted and asked for.
Few replies aren't happy with 50m. But I thought they just wanted the stadium washing?
I think I do.Nobody knows what that means
I do now Fair play.I think I do.
I could have been wrong. I have a very vivid imagination.I do now Fair play.
Bloody hell. didn’t see that comingAlan Shariah mentioned Human Rights, didn't expect that MOTD!
That f***ing wanker has spent the last 18 months acting as a mouthpiece for the saudis. Now the deal is done he wants to go back to George the man of principle. What an utter cretin he is.
That f***ing wanker has spent the last 18 months acting as a mouthpiece for the saudis. Now the deal is done he wants to go back to George the man of principle. What an utter cretin he is.
I've still been sneaking in the odd 1 or 2I got two points on me licence for doing that earlier. Not on this thread like.