D
Dilligaf60
Guest
Queen manda is a director isn’t she?This.
Surely the safest place to be is on the pitch? Being stuck in a directors box isn't.
Id feel much safer on the pitch than I would in her box for sure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Queen manda is a director isn’t she?This.
Surely the safest place to be is on the pitch? Being stuck in a directors box isn't.
Aye. Like that
As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But as long as our country is fine with that, and happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?
Aye, right. Gravy stains on this one.As a neutral
A neutral? Yet you seem to have done a bit of research. You're entitled to your opinion, but let's be honest, this has absolutely no effect on you does it?As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But it is and as long as our country is fine with that, and people are happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?
The Times seem to be doing some right digging here . . .
The new owners are clearly MINTED but lots and lots of questions to be asked about their intentions.
Staveley set up deal to include millions of pounds of loans from Ashley
Her company owe creditors £3 million.
All from The Times. Maybe their dislike of Ashley has papered over some big cracks in the new ownership??
Aye, fair one. They’d most likely shoot it down. Get carragher to hockle it out of the air.If it was a Sky game.. odds on Sky to show it in the Sky?
10,000/1
Another one
same shit that’s been thoroughly discredited dozens of times already. Read the thread. The answers you seek are all there.As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But it is and as long as our country is fine with that, and people are happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?
As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But it is and as long as our country is fine with that, and people are happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?
Aye, fair one. They’d most likely shoot it down. Get carragher to hockle it out of the air.
Interesting.The Times seem to be doing some right digging here . . .
The new owners are clearly MINTED but lots and lots of questions to be asked about their intentions.
Staveley set up deal to include millions of pounds of loans from Ashley
Her company owe creditors £3 million.
All from The Times. Maybe their dislike of Ashley has papered over some big cracks in the new ownership??
We need a thread for this...
Everything in there points to it, but I believe he was posting when we played Cheltenham. It shows unfortunately that people are being taken in by the what about shite. It'll change when the press turn.
Whataboutery.As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But it is and as long as our country is fine with that, and people are happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?
Unbelievable, this is superb nonsense.Red zone my arse. They are genuinely scared the spuds fans will give them shit. And sky won’t like it.
As a neutral the backlash about human rights just seems a bit off and hypocritical to me. People seem to forget that the Saudi PIF have been pumping cash into Man U and have sizeable stakes in Facebook and Uber.
Do I think half of London, developments in other cities, and chunks of our strategic infrastructure should be owned by the Saudis and other murderous regimes? No. But it is and as long as our country is fine with that, and people are happy to sell weapons to the Saudis etc to use in Yemen etc then I see no justification for making an exception of Newcastle United.
I gather there is a BAE Systems weapons factory just off the A1M at Washington. I assume those on here complaining about the Newcastle takeover are up there protesting against BAE making weapons for the Saudis and other similar countries?