Ashley In!!
Striker
The powers that be are busy. Meetings about things before the end of the month apparently. Can't think what they've got to talk about
They could ok them when they are wasting away their time on twitter of course
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The powers that be are busy. Meetings about things before the end of the month apparently. Can't think what they've got to talk about
They could ok them when they are wasting away their time on twitter of course
Did Methven do his fact checking and confirm?It will be a little while. The meeting wasn't just RAWA, but all the supporters groups involved on the engagement side. Everyone will need to agree on the content, and there are couple of things where Charlie wants to confirm details beforehand (basically just checking his facts).
Did Methven do his fact checking and confirm?
To be fair that’s different to what’s been said above .That's essentially what we're waiting for.
To be fair that’s different to what’s been said above .
It is . Two weeks ago Charlie was fact checking and now the minutes have only been given to them at the weekend. I think and again I’m sure this isn’t the impression that it looks like a lack of transparency. There is potential for 2/3 or the agenda items to be historic before the wider fanbase hears what has been said .No it isn't. We're waiting for the club to approve the minutes. Methven's fact-checking is part of that process.
It is . Two weeks ago Charlie was fact checking and now the minutes have only been given to them at the weekend. I think and again I’m sure this isn’t the impression that it looks like a lack of transparency. There is potential for 2/3 or the agenda items to be historic before the wider fanbase hears what has been said .
Blame me then. I was still trying to make some of the finance stuff comprehensible at the weekend, following comments that it was difficult to understand. The club doesn't see the minutes until everyone else has. I, and everyone else, has no interest in covering things up. Among other things, I need to be seen as independent of the club when I'm writing stuff.
Blame me then. I was still trying to make some of the finance stuff comprehensible at the weekend, following comments that it was difficult to understand. The club doesn't see the minutes until everyone else has. I, and everyone else, has no interest in covering things up. Among other things, I need to be seen as independent of the club when I'm writing stuff.
I sometimes wonder whether people understand how this works.
It’s not that I don’t believe the process. It is that it is an unnecessary over complicated non transparent process . It was a q an a and not a decision making body. Revision or tidying of the minutes or an interpretation of them isn’t appropriate or necessary. Being abusive to people who engage politely and courteously isn’t the way to beYer flogging a dead horse with some of the dipshits on here, god knows how many times in this thread Alone that you have explained the process and it’s reasoning yet there are still some that refuse to believe you.
Better off telling them to fuck off
It’s not that I don’t believe the process. It is that it is an unnecessary over complicated non transparent process . It was a q an a and not a decision making body. Revision or tidying of the minutes or an interpretation of them isn’t appropriate or necessary. Being abusive to people who engage politely and courteously isn’t the way to be
They do and believe there are people with experience of formal meeting process . They may think like I do that this is overly formal and the wider fanbase could be updated without interpretation of what was said or without tidying of minutes of what is not a decision making groupClearly not.
What rules ?It’s the rules of cross party meetings.
Literally broken records some on here, moan and groan about the same things day in and night. I can only assume they are all hen pecked husbands with little winkies
It’s not that I don’t believe the process. It is that it is an unnecessary over complicated non transparent process . It was a q an a and not a decision making body. Revision or tidying of the minutes or an interpretation of them isn’t appropriate or necessary. Being abusive to people who engage politely and courteously isn’t the way to be
The 'boys' closing ranks are getting just as boring marra. I think the group should listen to the views of the supporters and see if they can meet their needs.It’s the rules of cross party meetings.
Literally broken records some on here, moan and groan about the same things day in and night. I can only assume they are all hen pecked husbands with little winkies
The 'boys' closing ranks are getting just as boring marra. I think the group should listen to the views of the supporters and see if they can meet their needs.
There's your fundamental mistake. The club can and do take action points away. It's fan engagement. A Q&A is what they do on a Friday night at a working men's club. The aim of this is actually to get things done where possible. Clearly, that side is limited when it comes to things like finance. It's very real when it comes to matchday stuff.
There seems to be a reluctance to accept that it would be a good aim to get information out quickly or at least examine the communication processes. Fans wanting to get info from their elected reps seem to be getting belittled.Things have already happened regarding the ground and what happens around matches as a result of ideas coming from the supporters side. Your second sentence is actually the aim of the meeting. On finance especially, however,commercial confidentiality will restrict what the club can say, and I'm not about to sign an NDA which stops me commenting here.
They do and believe there are people with experience of formal meeting process . They may think like I do that this is overly formal and the wider fanbase could be updated without interpretation of what was said or without tidying of minutes of what is not a decision making group
What rules ?