It just represents a shift in demographics.
Honestly the quality of the shows have gone up, WWE's biggest problem right now is that their biggest asset is ironically their biggest problem - Roman Reigns has defended his 2 belts once in 100 days and counting so far (Vs Riddle) and they've got to figure a way how their monster heel can lose a belt without looking him looking weaker. And they're on a limited time to do it as Survivor Series is a Brand Champion v Brand Champion PPV.
They had 3 options at MITB imo have Rollins win, take 1 belt off reigns by cashing in at Summerscam, eventually leading to Cody winning at mania.
2. Give it to Riddle who actually is popular and not being rammed down everyone’s throat like Austin theory, cashes in on lesnar after summerslam, have riddle and orton have a long feud.
3, this was least likely (massively) Zayn wins beats Reigns after summerslam which factors into the whole Sami Zayn trying to join the bloodline craic , becomes transitional champ until the uk ppv where Drew McIntyre to win.
Instead we got Austin Theory who is very good but not ready to have a world title run.
And I get people think reign’s is the problem but there is no one realistically who can beat him because of bad creative not getting people over and building people up instead we get part time Brock v part time Reigns, they were focusing on Cody and the second he got injured they were screwed because they don’t have anyone built to replace him.
So I imagine McIntyre will take one of him at uk ppv, which will be a class moment to see in the uk but to have reigns lose to McIntyre is just meh to me, they should have built someone the last 2,3years and they haven’t.
You must be logged on to see media items
Basically this