YES WE GYAN
Striker
Did the outcome just end up being a slap on the wrist for each of the clubs?Latest meeting over Newcastle overseas player ineligibility tonight apparently do should hear about the outcome soon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did the outcome just end up being a slap on the wrist for each of the clubs?Latest meeting over Newcastle overseas player ineligibility tonight apparently do should hear about the outcome soon.
Points deductions for next year apparently. 120 for Newcastle, 60 for Chester and Stockton and 30 for Washington I believe (or along those lines). Someone more ITK may be able to confirm or correct.
f***ing hell.
South Shields?
Apparently for this year just been and Newcastle striped of banks. #justiceforburnopfield
Think shields deducted same and so still relegated - someone who has seen the statement may be able to clarify more?
Will it mean the winner of the Salver will just be left blank?
I don't think if it was me I'd want to get the trophy after having lost the final - even if they were cheated. Would feel hollow.
Washy 30 points deduction for having limited overseas experience and the player having been approved by the league.Thanks, Big Bird.
Haven't read it all - can you summarise?
9 pointsStockton's deduction keeps them up by just a few points then
There clearly must be some sort of further clarity needed then? I'm absolutely gobsmacked at CLS CC not knowing the rules considering the chairman of that club is the chairman of the league.Retrospective points deductions are hardly a punishment but 2 seasons without an overseas is an effective deterrent. To be fair the problem arose partly because FTECB aren't clear on rules of eligibility -now there's a surprise.
That was mentioned in the report basically saying that CLS were well aware of the rules given their chairmans position. Surely a review of the league exec should take place as a consequenceThere clearly must be some sort of further clarity needed then? I'm absolutely gobsmacked at CLS CC not knowing the rules considering the chairman of that club is the chairman of the league.
Retrospective points deductions are hardly a punishment but 2 seasons without an overseas is an effective deterrent. To be fair the problem arose partly because FTECB aren't clear on rules of eligibility -now there's a surprise.
Although Newcastle have done relatively well recently their finances et al were in a shocking state not so long ago and I'm not sure that they have much of a junior section to shout about.Newcastle don't have a leg to stand on IMO. They knew their lad had been turned away from the Birmingham league already, yet still went ahead and signed him. Surely Chester are also better placed than anyone to know the rules too with Robson in charge. If they were more unfashionable clubs they would have had the book thrown at them.
Oswell s cheque book out in force at burnopfield.Although Newcastle have done relatively well recently their finances et al were in a shocking state not so long ago and I'm not sure that they have much of a junior section to shout about.
Chester le Street seem to be at a bit of a cross roads but always had a good eye for talent. They have some good junior cricketers coming through who are starting to make an impact at senior level which bodes well for them.
I've heard that South North arent particularly well placed financially presently and was told a story about them by an NEPL club chairman that raised eyebrows and I wont repeat on here. Could of course be wrong, but I'll be interested too see what team they turn out next year and how many high earners are shed. Melvyn Betts of course left as head coach and the position went part time I was told.
Melvyn is now first team cricket coach at Burnopfield although will still play for Sacriston I was told.