pavarotti1980
Striker
So it seems the number of police is consistent across the broad spectrum of fixtures.
It seems like journalism now only articles based on FOI requests.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So it seems the number of police is consistent across the broad spectrum of fixtures.
Eh, and eh?So it seems the number of police is consistent across the broad spectrum of fixtures.
It seems like journalism now only articles based on FOI requests.
The number of police in a lower league game per number of supporters is the same as a premier league game. c. 1 police per 50 supporters.Eh, and eh?
So why the disparity in costs between us and Mags?The number of police in a lower league game per number of supporters is the same as a premier league game. c. 1 police per 50 supporters.
The way in which this data was derived was from FOI requests, which seems to be the mainstay of journalism now. They dont go an investigate things they just bang out 100s of FOI requests and publish data Daily Mail style.
Because there are more supporters at Sunderland than at somewhere like Gillingham, therefore more coppers. There wouldnt be a disparity in costs as it is a standard cost per head, it would simply be the numbers involved. Maybe 20 at Gillingham, 300 Sunderland (made up figures)So why the disparity in costs
between us and the magsBecause there are more supporters at Sunderland than at somewhere like Gillingham, therefore more coppers
Because there are more supporters at Sunderland than at somewhere like Gillingham, therefore more coppers
And why is Hartlepool vs Gateshead costing approx £2000-£2500 less than a Newcastle home fixture that attracts 48000 more folk? Makes no sensebetween us and the mags
Same principle as already shown loads of times. More private land at SoL so we pay for those. Hardly any public land at SDA so it is absorbed into the everyday cost of policing therefore not chargeable to the club. People suggest a greate number of stewards inside the stadium at SDA as well so reduced policing numbers again.between us and the mags
what are they policing ? sizzlers? Elite Sweets ?Same principle as already shown loads of times. More private land at SoL so we pay for those. Hardly any public land at SDA so it is absorbed into the everyday cost of policing. People suggest a greate number of stewards inside the stadium at SDA as well so reduced policing numbers again.
Same principle as already shown loads of times. More private land at SoL so we pay for those. Hardly any public land at SDA so it is absorbed into the everyday cost of policing therefore not chargeable to the club. People suggest a greate number of stewards inside the stadium at SDA as well so reduced policing numbers again.
We could get the local MP on to help out.... knowing Sunderland, half the council and local paper are mags anywayInformation that could be gained from looking deeper into the available resource rather than, as you suggest, lazily getting top-level stats and banging an article out.
We could get the local MP on to help out.... knowing Sunderland, half the council and local paper are mags anyway
bottom line is the difference in costs per attendance
a) which Premier League match is being used for comparison?The number of police in a lower league game per number of supporters is the same as a premier league game. c. 1 police per 50 supporters.
If the powers that be didn't try to control and hide such information the media wouldn't need to use FOI requests. Do you think the police have a legitimate reason not to release this data when requested? Do you think that they shouldn't have been ordered to release it?The way in which this data was derived was from FOI requests, which seems to be the mainstay of journalism now. They dont go an investigate things they just bang out 100s of FOI requests and publish data Daily Mail style.
a) which Premier League match is being used for comparison?
If you ever have to deal with FOI requests, you will realise that the whole system is a crock of 5hit. People request data but without context it means nothing. In the environment I deal with the FOI requests are companies trying to discover what there competitors are paying per unit to undercut them at the next tenderIf the powers that be didn't try to control and hide such information the media wouldn't need to use FOI requests. Do you think the police have a legitimate reason not to release this data when requested? Do you think that they shouldn't have been ordered to release it?
PS How would 'investigative reporting' work in this case? You want them to get coppers drunk and then pump them for information? Or do you want journalists to be going through the police bins and trying to piece together shredded documents and knackered hard-drives?
DO I requests and similarly, disclosure requests, for a large organisation, are a nightmare. Nobody is hiding information, but it's not lying on a desk waiting to be passed on. Somebody has to be employed to search records and prepare the data for release, trying not to miss anything in the masses of data to be examined.Sorry Championship game. I was dreaming we were still in PL
b) These aren't representative cases, these are a list of some of the over the top ones, hence the << Experts tell me some clubs believe games are "often over-policed" >> comment.
If you ever have to deal with FOI requests, you will realise that the whole system is a crock of 5hit. People request data but without context it means nothing. In the environment I deal with the FOI requests are companies trying to discover what there competitors are paying per unit to undercut them at the next tender
How did journalists used to write stories before the inception of FOI Act? Were there no written media prior to 2000? Same as football didnt exist before 1992 and the Premier LEague i guess
I wish they would employ somebody. It is just absorbed by people into their working day. I am currently onto my 4th hour sorting one request. All because a marketing company want to know something for their clientDO I requests and similarly, disclosure requests, for a large organisation, are a nightmare. Nobody is hiding information, but it's not lying on a desk waiting to be passed on. Somebody has to be employed to search records and prepare the data for release, trying not to miss anything in the masses of data to be examined.
Someone should tweet Donald about that as it's quite frankly disgraceful. Costs are way too high. Costs are set by the police forces.