deleted user 785
Striker
Remember when people were like wailing fannies because he wouldn't sell to the jormans? 
lol
lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anything like this would show up at Companies house in our annual statement, It would be a line item somewhere, and if not it would be a hell of a lot of money to illegally launderWell thats a daft question. It will all come out over the next few months, it has to. Why would it take 5yrs for the details of a takeover of 1 of the biggest clubs in england to come out ? Its impossible.
not gonna happen... the hidden agenda for some is still possible
If we are truly debt free that's bloody brilliant, however, there is surely a catch ? Would be too good to be true, especially where this club is concerned.
Seems like they have a fairly healthy discussion going to me.I don’t think anyone needs to apologise. It was what was, and he isn’t blameless as you say. These kind of threads are divisive, and serve absolutely no purpose.
I was wrong, I admit it. I thought he would take every parachute payment then stick us in administration. He did a very noble and decent thing writing off all the debt. Still his fault for where we are though.
Seems like they have a fairly healthy discussion going to me.
That wasnt your question tho. Your question was within 5yrs. It will all come out when the consortioum is confirmed which wont take 5yrs.So, you don't believe he's left the club debt free now ... fair enough.
My question is 'if nothing comes out in the next few months, to contradict that, you'll believe what he's said?'
Old enough,
Don’t groom me.
I’m 39 marra!
.... and it's killing them.
There must have been dozens of posters who vehemently insisted Short had a plan to take the club into administration and 'thereby line his pockets' or whatever. Even logical replies by people who understand finance, such as @Grumpy Old Man, were dismissed out of hand by people who 'knew better'.
I suspect this is the reason for so many of these 'I bet there are hidden clauses from Short and we'll be paying him for years' threads.
I've seen people claiming all kinds of dirty tricks regarding the takeover that will come back to haunt us, they simply refuse to believe we're debt free.
FFS lads, just accept he's done the decent thing and has given us the chance to draw a line on the past. Going back over Short, Bain, Byrne, etc etc etc is destructive and part of the problem. It's often said, on here, that there's a self destructive attitude from people who just happy clap and accept shit ..... so why don't those people look on the bright side, for once, and accept this opportunity to rebuild the club in the right way, just a thought.
That wasnt your question tho. Your question was within 5yrs. It will all come out when the consortioum is confirmed which wont take 5yrs.
Maybe, maybe not, but he's certainly not as daft as you.Short is a 100% daft cūnt that shafted the club, only a fool would see it any other way.