GlosMackem
Central Defender
Won't take a vaccine from a non profit organization.
Socialist scum.
Socialist scum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What did they lie about and who is quoted from the Americans (just a guess they will be) in the article?More bad news, looks like somebody was telling porkies as I kind f suspected:
Doubts raised over AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine data
Oxford university acknowledges error that forced trial to switch dosing regimenswww.ft.com
What did they lie about and who is quoted from the Americans (just a guess they will be) in the article?
Behind a paywall
So what did they lie about then?Basically, apart from the accidental mess up with the samples, which we know about already, they did not disclose that the small subset group that all received the half dose first were all under 55 years old.
So what did they lie about then?
Who is discrediting it?
Did they disclose something that wasnt true? Did they the state the subset of patients receiving 1/2 then full dose were over 55?I think its pretty clear what they did. Its the Financial Times reporting it man, not the Sun what won it.
Did they disclose something that wasnt true? Did they the state the subset of patients receiving 1/2 then full dose were over 55?
So they didnt lie then. thanks for clearing it up.Sadly looks like I was right on this one with my initial suspicions.
No mate, but the fact the shares are dipping and all the others are gaining substantially tells the story. They witheld information dishonestly in my view, it was all very dodgy.
So they didnt lie then. thanks for clearing it up.
You will be glad to hear the quoted person in the article is one Moncef Slaoui, who is charge of the US vaccine task force. Who would have guessed the Americans trying to manipulate the situation for financial gain on a vaccine that isnt being produced and sold at cost value......
"On Tuesday, Moncef Slaoui, the head of Operation Warp Speed, the US government's funding programme for vaccine development, disclosed that the subgroup that scored 90% was limited to people aged 55 or below, a demographic with lower risk of developing severe Covid-19, FT reported".
ps both my Astra and Pfizer shares have dropped today (0.09% and 0.22% respectively) as off 11:31:10
No i didnt say that. I just said you have said they lied and then proven that it has nothing to do with lies as they didnt say anything at all.So are you saying they did not withhold the info? Its all a conspiracy I suppose?
It wouldnt be in the FT and shares would not be dropping unless something was up. Just think about the data yourself for a second - 1,700 cases all under 55.
Astrazeneca up 0.01% today when I looked.I think its pretty clear what they did. Its the Financial Times reporting it man, not the Sun what won it.
Oh one more thing in the artlcle, shares in AstraZeneca are down 6% whereas Pfizer ,BioNTech , Moderna all up siginificanttly
No i didnt say that. I just said you have said they lied and then proven that it has nothing to do with lies as they didnt say anything at all.
SHare price is not reflective of efficacy of a vaccine for goodness sake. Its reflects the relative profitability of the business. Otherwise why has Pfizer dropped and a manufacturer who hasnt released any trial data gone up?......
And the FT needs to sell papers and make headlines
Wait for full data from all 3 and then a conclusion can be sought. Up till then its all ifs, but's and maybe's
Astrazeneca up 0.01% today when I looked.
You said this. What else did you say then?Very good, except I never said that
More bad news, looks like somebody was telling porkies as I kind f suspected:
some folk on twitter in the 50-64 yr old category recieving text messages from their GP advising they hope to start this on december 12th
some folk on twitter in the 50-64 yr old category recieving text messages from their GP advising they hope to start this on december 12th
My dad has heard nowt and he’s 54 and vulnerable. Not vulnerable enough obviouslyI still don't see an issue, whether it is 90% or 70%, if the efficacy is above 50% then it should get approval
These must be in the vulnerable group as there wont be enough vaccine yet for everyone over 50.