Never seen it but I was just reading about it the other day - only got a 6.8 on IMDB (but will probably give it watch, I like him - he's intense but thorough in his acting skills).Have you seen *You Were Never Really Here"? Lots of Joaquin for your money in a much better film
I feel like I’ve seen Inherent Vice but don’t remember anything about it so maybe I haven’t. Phoenix and Paul Thomas Anderson pretty much the best actor and director around though imo.
Rachel weisz probably has a lot to do with that. Entertaining enough overall but pretty shit really. Some bizarre views in this thread mind, some all time classics slated to fuck.It wasn’t hyped on release, but search this board for threads about greatest war films and it’s always mentioned, despite the fact it’s plop.
That 6.8 is made up of people who loved it and people who didn't like it. If you like it it's a 9/10, 10/10 film. If you don't like it you'll switch it off after half an hourNever seen it but I was just reading about it the other day - only got a 6.8 on IMDB (but will probably give it watch, I like him - he's intense but thorough in his acting skills).
I was disappointed with 1917, but was heavily outnumbered in my family so thought it was me being fussy.1917, well made but boring.
Dunkirk, well made but didn't get the sheer scale of it for me, looked more like a couple of coachloads of the beaches.