New home kit

[MackneyHackem]

Terrible

I reckon the shirt might have looked quite canny with the intended sponsor.

Agreed. Or even the new sponsor with the white background.

Can't believe they've done what they have. It's disgraceful. The Thai snides from Dhgate will look better.

 

[deleted user 785]

The sponsor thing is very poor mind. Strips should be as new. Not rehashed kits.

 

[chopsfc007]

The sponsor thing is very poor mind. Strips should be as new. Not rehashed kits.

Agreed but the rest isn't as bad as being made out

 

[Disco_Pants93]

The sponsor thing is very poor mind. Strips should be as new. Not rehashed kits.

Can't believe they thought they'd get away with it

 

[deleted user 785]

Agreed but the rest isn't as bad as being made out

I like the kit however they shouldn't be sold at full price like that.

Very poor imo

 

[rey mysterio]

Is the slight colour difference between stripes and sponsor down to “Sunderland Red” being the only colour our home kits can be (Sir Bobs idea) and that it is patented?

 

[SAFC 83]

The haven't even got the red background on the sponsor the right shade of red man it's f***ing tragically shit.

Looks like they've had to use a darker shade of red so it covers the Betdaq logo properly. It looks terrible ffs.

 

[silas80]

They could have least put another cover on the inside so you couldn't see it. Should knock £15 off it just for that.

 

[chopsfc007]

I like the kit however they shouldn't be sold at full price like that.

Very poor imo

Iv had it paid for me hopefully it isn't as bad as I now expect should be a good 15 quid cheaper

 

[Mickdundee]

They should have sold off the Betdaq ones at a reduced price and had the correct sponsor ones made up and sold at full price.

 

[Mexico]

We probably should’ve kept Betdaq on the “fan kits” and had the squad playing with the charity one, then maybe released the charity sponsor around Christmas as a limited edition and given the proceeds away.

 

[Zidane]

Logon or register to see this image

That tiny change to sponsor background makes a huge difference. And if they had done black stripes and black adidas badge to link it in with the shorts, then it would have looked half decent.

Clowns.

 

[Whitburnmakem]

They should have sold off the Betdaq ones at a reduced price and had the correct sponsor ones made up and sold at full price.

They will of been refunded for the printed strips by betdaq but instead of making new strips will of just pocketed the money as they are skint

 

[Deleted User 18963]

Utter nonsense. Not everyone shares the same opinion

It has the old sponsor still printed underneath. Its pure unprofessional and cheap. Not even a debate if you like the look if it. Its lacking actual quality.

 

[deleted user 785]

It has the old sponsor still printed underneath. Its pure unprofessional and cheap. Not even a debate if you like the look if it. Its lacking actual quality.

Seen that after mate, apologies. I like the kit but that whole sponsor bollocks is very poor

 

[Mainze]

Logon or register to see this image

 

[Safc_Number10]

It has the old sponsor still printed underneath. Its pure unprofessional and cheap. Not even a debate if you like the look if it. Its lacking actual quality.

Should have cut their losses to save face rather than covering it up. Very unprofessional.

 

[Junior Birdman]

The sponsor thing is very poor mind. Strips should be as new. Not rehashed kits.

Just seen this...

Logon or register to see this image

 

[deleted user 785]

Just seen this...

Logon or register to see this image

The worst thing about that picture is the hideous tattoo on the finger

 

[Whitburnmakem]

Why didn’t they just do the sponsor background black! and u wouldn’t of been able to see it ! Who the fuck made that decision to have a different shade of red as the sponsor background