• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Michael Vaughan


You must be logged on to see media items
"Significant story in cricket". What's wrong with saying he has been accused of racism at a cricket club and remains suspended whilst this is investigated. This makes it sound like he is too busy uncovering match fixing in cricket or some other "story" - it's not a story, it is a real life disgrace.
 
Vaughan had released a much more sensible statement than his last one saying the issue is much more important than him and he wants to help moving forward etc.
 
Was always going to happen.

Aside from his absolute whopperness and associated allegations, when he actually talks about Crixket, he can be informative.

That said, the bad outweighs the good.
 
Vaughan had released a much more sensible statement than his last one saying the issue is much more important than him and he wants to help moving forward etc.
Yep…almost as if someone has had a word with him

“The issues facing cricket are bigger than any individual case and I want to be part of the solution, listening, educating myself and helping to make it a more welcoming sport for all.”

would be a start
 
Yep…almost as if someone has had a word with him

“The issues facing cricket are bigger than any individual case and I want to be part of the solution, listening, educating myself and helping to make it a more welcoming sport for all.”

would be a start
Assuming he genuinely can’t recall if in the first instance he had just said “In all honesty I can’t recall saying anything of that nature but I do apologise if anything I did say caused offence” He would be admitting to nothing and would probably still be doing his bbc stuff. Saying he definitely didn’t say it 10 years after when 3 others say otherwise while he is a complete rentaquote didn’t do him any favours.
 
Was always going to happen.

Aside from his absolute whopperness and associated allegations, when he actually talks about Crixket, he can be informative.

That said, the bad outweighs the good.

Agree with this like. the problem is even when on commentary he's only actually talking eloquently about cricket half the time at best, the rest of the time he's playing up to his laddish seemingly totally false persona. i say seemingly false because frankly h's not very good at it. which is imo what makes him come across as a bellend. if he just stuck to what he's good at, cricket, he's very insightful and, as you say, informative. a great listen at times, a nightmare at others
 
Agree with this like. the problem is even when on commentary he's only actually talking eloquently about cricket half the time at best, the rest of the time he's playing up to his laddish seemingly totally false persona. i say seemingly false because frankly h's not very good at it. which is imo what makes him come across as a bellend. if he just stuck to what he's good at, cricket, he's very insightful and, as you say, informative. a great listen at times, a nightmare at others

That's how I feel about Shane Warne and Graeme Swann as commentators too. They have a great knowledge of the game and clear passion to know what's going on around the world in the sport, not just the top nations or test cricket like some of the older commentators. But the laddish persona can be really nauseating.
 
You must be logged on to see media items
No surprise there. I loved Boycott as a player but his away from the cricket behaviour - conviction for domestic violence at the top of the list - should have deemed him unsuitable. Nobody cancels these people, they cancel themselves. In terms of game analysis Boycott brought much more than Vaughan who is very easy to replace. If Vaughan really wants to be part of the solution - he doesn't, he just wants his old life and status back because he fucked up his response to the situation he played a part in creating - he would be telling supporters like Boycott to stop the 'cancel culture' rhetoric.
 
Back
Top