LJP1786
Striker
He said last week we wouldn't signing strikers tbf
He will be off like
Aye he’ll be away unfortunately but Barnes knows absolutely nout like.
Never gets anything right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He said last week we wouldn't signing strikers tbf
He will be off like
He’s worth at least 30 if that Leeds lad has gone for 40We should be taking the twats to the cleaners man. Not haggling for another 5m more. They've thrown money around all summer and now they want to try and get our best player for as cheap as they can.
Hope they get relegated the bastards. Not bitter or owt, honest![]()
It's been reported by a few people now but they're coming back closer to the 25m with add onsHas it?
Who are the people reporting that? 25 + add ons is a canny priceIt's been reported by a few people now but they're coming back closer to the 25m with add ons
I seen a couple of things on X can't remember which journalist said it now but I'll try and find it. Mark Douglas reported that the bid was too low before so basically it's been rejected.Who are the people reporting that? 25 + add ons is a canny price
For me, it feels like £20m is probably enough for us to build our the depth in our squad at CB, probably sign the two strikers we need and replace him at left wing with someone who can contribute 10 goals a season.
It’s an odd one. I thought Brentford or Bournemouth wolves palace might have been in for him.I don't understand why seemingly only Ipswich are in for him. He was linked with Wolves previously
That div said we likely won’t sign a striker as well - other than a prem kid on loan.Barnes on Total Sport saying it looks like Clarke will go to Ipswich.
They’ll be negotiating over the fee and expects Ipswich to agree a £20m + £5m add on deal to get it done.
If we keep Clarke our chances of going up are a damn sight better than if we sell him. In light of other championship deals that have gone through and the fact that Ipswich are rolling in it, we should not accept any deal less than £25m up front.Barnes on Total Sport saying it looks like Clarke will go to Ipswich.
They’ll be negotiating over the fee and expects Ipswich to agree a £20m + £5m add on deal to get it done.
Its utterly depressing we've got to sell our best player for whatever we can get to be able to sign a striker.All these wet wipes wiping their fannies over clarke maybe going, yes he was our most dangerous forward last year when we had no strikers and most of the time had to beat 2/3 players but to say we don't have a replacement is stupid. We don't need a replacement as good as clarke albeit it would be brilliant but I think with mundle there and the 2 new strikers plus mayender up front he'll only have 1 defender on him. Those 3 c/f whoever plays will take away those defenders that clarke had to get past to make things happen, mundle could be just as effective with his speed going past the right back. Teams aren't gonna put 2/3 players on him when we have such good c/f. Just my thoughts and I don't care if no one agrees
It's a lot of money and a big risk.I don't understand why seemingly only Ipswich are in for him. He was linked with Wolves previously
Personally don’t think Barnes has a clue what goes on at the club, he was telling us we weren’t going to sign a striker a week ago and viola 2 incoming.Barnes on Total Sport saying it looks like Clarke will go to Ipswich.
They’ll be negotiating over the fee and expects Ipswich to agree a £20m + £5m add on deal to get it done.
Funded by the Clarke moneyPersonally don’t think Barnes has a clue what goes on at the club, he was telling us we weren’t going to sign a striker a week ago and viola 2 incoming.