Latin Scout
Full Back
You can talk about prize money and professionalism but revenue of the men's game is far higher due to far greater interest from both sponsors and fans.
The only major sport which had similar levels of fan and sponsorship interest is tennis and, their the ladies get similar prize money (even for playing less sets). The Williams Sisters, Stefi Graf, Martina Navratilova, Monica Seles, Gabriela Sabatini, Anna Kournikova, for differing reasons, and various others, have been household names.
The world isn't unnecessarily cruel. If a ladies' sport has sufficient interest, it will get more fans, more airtime, more sponsors and bigger prize money. Until it does, why should their be some sexual political gender agenda?
What about seniors sport, or youth sport or disabled sport or just unpopular sports? Should they also get extra rations despite not having strong fanbases.
The World disabled female seniors invitational curling match should get the same money as the Champions League Final.....
Go home. Nothing to see here
The only major sport which had similar levels of fan and sponsorship interest is tennis and, their the ladies get similar prize money (even for playing less sets). The Williams Sisters, Stefi Graf, Martina Navratilova, Monica Seles, Gabriela Sabatini, Anna Kournikova, for differing reasons, and various others, have been household names.
The world isn't unnecessarily cruel. If a ladies' sport has sufficient interest, it will get more fans, more airtime, more sponsors and bigger prize money. Until it does, why should their be some sexual political gender agenda?
What about seniors sport, or youth sport or disabled sport or just unpopular sports? Should they also get extra rations despite not having strong fanbases.
The World disabled female seniors invitational curling match should get the same money as the Champions League Final.....
Go home. Nothing to see here