C
Cowvahlo
Guest
That building came down in a completely different way to WTC7. You can see one corner went first followed by the rest of the building. The argument for WTC7 being a controlled explosion is that for it to have fallen in the way it did, every aspect of the construction of the building must have failed at the exactly the same time. If it did come down by fire all four corners would not have fallen at exactly the same time, there would have been part of the building collapse possibly then followed by the rest.
Buildings just don't fall down due to fire, certainly not straight down like the above
Must be a controlled demolition - the Iranians are trying to erode the freedoms of their people and planned the false flag building collapse.
It's the only rational explanation.
We're not asking you to believe everything that is said about 9/11 but surely you must be able to see that there are aspects of WTC7 that are very very dodgy?