I'm Spartacus
Striker
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think breaking down the board fosters a sub mentality which then becomes dominant, look at the way the shit from the politics forum spills onto here... guilty as charged anarl like but I'm just a victim of the circumstancesI wouldn't mind the politics coming back now.
I can remember when this place only had two boards ffs!
Elvis is alive, we didn't land on the moon and Paul McCartney is dead.
Logon or register to see this image
shit looks like this when it fails due to fire
Logon or register to see this image
The other story is that it was done to destroy files the CIA were holding and going to use in several high profile court cases that were going to cost some high profile companies an awful lot of money, damage reputations and send people to prison for a long long time.
Trump isn't the elite mate, he's a relative Chav when it comes to the eliteWhich elite was this? The other rich people you mentioned earlier?
You've changed man. Youmademerealise would never have stooped to pathetic ego-boosting stunts like this
Bits of paper? What about banks of servers? Slightly harder to run those through shredder.Aye, that's the easiest way to get rid of bits of paper I heard.
Every time we have a clear out at work we organise a high scale terror attack next door hoping our building gets damaged, set on fire and collapses. Very efficient method of disposing of documents there mate.
If it was that obvious marra how come in the official report they said the cause was fire? The damage the planes caused didn't fit it with the story as we would have seen a asymmetric collapse. There was no pancaking either. That was confirmed by everyone.
I've mentioned this on a thread previously, thats not necessarily the case...take war for example, thousand of people are sent to war, to kill, bomb and fight under the name of a certain cause. Those people follow the orders blindly. The orders and the decision to go to war is taken by relatively few people.
The point is people will do what they are told to do if they believe in a cause. It doesnt take thousands of people to do something like this.
Can you outline what liberties and freedoms we have lost since 911?Some good questions which I have pondered over
First question.
Put simply mate. It's money. We had a good discussion on this in the last thread about Larry silverstein. Follow the money.
Here's a good vid on it mate.
Second question. This one is tougher to answer as you have to try and put yourself in their minds. I will try though. Right. One relatively big attack is better than smaller ones is down to a few reasons. First of all they needed a big paradym shift in human consciousness to getaway with eroding so many liberties and freedoms in a short space of time eg patriot act. To get away with making new departments to drain even more money from populace like department of homeland security etc. They detailed this all in the pnac document.
Your last sentence I don't agree with mate. Nee way these rag tag operation from a cave could've pulled off this job......without help.
Here we go, people bandy about this 'thousands of people involved', why does there have to be that many people involved?Surely you aren't suggesting that out of a cast of thousands nobody would have been overcome by guilt/turned to God/flipped out and blabbed?
How many flew into WTC7How many 747's flew into that?
Bits of paper? What about banks of servers? Slightly harder to run those through shredder.
How many flew into WTC7
I swear half the people who discuss this are completely unaware of WTC7 and just assume people are arguing over the twin towers
So the CIA are just going to let a group of people in and destroy their servers?Why didn't they just destroy them normally then? Seems a bit batshit mental to destroy a building to destroy a hard disc, sorry bank of servers.
wibble
So the CIA are just going to let a group of people in and destroy their servers?
'Hew marra, me gaffer is going to be up on some pretty hefty charges, is it alright if I come in and smash the place up so he gets off?'
'Aye, nee bother, gan for it, its not as if we're a law enforcement agency or anything'
Even when they have been proven to be extremely gullible some posters still come on here professing to know all about "what really happened"Not this f***ing shit again. It crops up so often it should have its own sub-forum.
Buildings just don't fall down due to fire, certainly not straight down like the above
Must be a controlled demolition - the Iranians are trying to erode the freedoms of their people and planned the false flag building collapse.
It's the only rational explanation.
Who says it was the CIA that organised it? Let your imagination run wild for a second here and that me and you want to get rid of some exceptionally dodgy information that is going to send us to prison for a long time and wipe out our collective fortune.So the top boys in the CIA that organised 9/11 don't have access to their own computers?
I think you're onto a loser here marra.
It's a stone cold fact that not a single plane hit WTC7 mate.....I'm not unaware. I just don't wear a tin foil hat.