Botchie
Striker
And bill them for the expense.
3500 potential terrorists living in U.K.
- Thread starter Fletch
- Start date
- Status
Forty
Midfield
You cant deport someone who is born here.
I had no issue either with anyone who went to fight in Syria. They were more than welcolme to go, but once you went you werent allowed back in.
To start with, it's not a state. Certainly not one we have recognised.
Should we recognise Islamic State?
My guess would be it's a case of the legal system being a bit complicated
dixonsafc
Striker
Get them all on the boat! Scum!
Tadger
Striker
And a partridge in a pear tree.
Malloy
Winger
Logon or register to see this image
Tadger
Striker
The law doesn't work like that.
Where should we send a white supremacist terrorist? Where would be more fitting to their worldview?
It wouldn't be classed as treason.
Unless we were at total war with another sovereign nation or somebody shot the Monarch I don't think anyone will ever be tried for treason again.
In any case the maximum punishment is life in jail.
Last edited:
max wartbug
Striker
One reason why firmer action isn't taken, I believe, is the community they live in will not believe they are a "potential" terrorist and will cause mayhem getting their point across. The potential terrorist will either have to be caught red handed (which will still be met with denial) or hunted down after the atrocity has occurred.
box2box
Striker
If the individuals are evidenced plotting to cause harm why wouldn't the uk justice system put them away ?
ouro
Striker
Look at the carry on in the media when young lasses were heading off to join ISIS, it was everybody else fault but theirs. If they want to go they should be actively encouraged and never allowed to return.
oddbod
Winger
The rule of Law !without that wree doomed ! if the state could do what they wanted without a look at the rule of law this country woult have been a totalitarian state from around 1926...if they banned the burger I would be on that list and if we had no laws there is no telling what i would do!
Last edited:
Not officially. It exists as a state in the minds of its supporters though, which is good enough for me.
They were children tbf mind.
ouro
Striker
Not all of them, and those that were under UK law are not viewed as children by their chosen Caliphate.
As a parent myself I'd like to think I would have some idea if my daughter had radical Islamist leanings, what were their parents up to?
max wartbug
Striker
The original question was about potential, you are looking at definite evidence.
What I am saying is that in certain communities it is prudent to have everyone on board and the evidence you speak of before anything is done. Some areas have particular requirements and these need delicate handling. To march in and lift someone who has "potential" will bring about massive issues of future trust etc and could result in riots.
Well that's not good enough
Syria is still a state. You can't chuck British citizens at it
But you continue to appease to the daily mail crew mate. You're smarter than that
It is good enough. I don't want ISIS supporters in this country. I certainly don't want to be paying to keep them in our prisons, where they're a risk to other inmates and will incur costs for their protection and healthcare.
I see terrorists as a totally different class of criminal, ones who've given up not only the right to participate in society but also the right to live in this country.
They have committed treason, a crime which deserves the greatest penalty we can give.
Strip them of their citizenship and repatriate them to the state they think exists or dump them on an unserviced island, just please don't expect the taxpayer to look after them, they don't deserve it.
God knows. It's obv a family/school issue.
The lasses were 15 and 16. Still in school.
- Status
