3500 potential terrorists living in U.K.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Frijj said:
Course you can. Why should we as a society have to pay the huge costs of imprisoning those people?

For one they'll spread their radicalism further in prison and for another they can never be let out. You cannot rehabilitate a terrorist.

We would be much safer as a society if we deprived them of their British citizenship.

They've declared their support for a state that is hostile to us. It is absolutely barmy to think we should allow them to remain here, either as free men or at huge cost to the taxpayer.
Click to expand...
You can deradicalise people.
 


Frijj said:
Why does it matter if they're a state or not? You keep saying this but you're not saying why it is important.

They control territory. If your hang up is that its technically Syrian territory, well the sovereignty of the Syrian state is a secondary concern to me.



It might. I'm also happy to have them sent away to a remote island.

I just don't want IS in my country.
Click to expand...

How are you going to open these negotiations to transport people to a country which doesn't exist?

How are going to get around international law?

What are you going to do with terrorists who don't support ISIS? How are you going to have consistency across all terrorist activity?
 
dixonsafc said:
How are you going to open these negotiations to transport people to a country which doesn't exist?

How are going to get around international law?

What are you going to do with terrorists who don't support ISIS? How are you going to have consistency across all terrorist activity?
Click to expand...
How are we going to find an empty island? :lol:

Rubber dinghy rapids innit bruv?
 
dixonsafc said:
Why don't you answer as to how we are going to just dump British Citizens on an island? Or just dump them in Syria?

If you can explain how you are going to manage this, then maybe I'll consider giving you a reasoned response.
Click to expand...

If it doesn't already exist, introduce legislation to strip British citizenship from anyone found guilty of plotting terror.

Put them on a ship to a remote, unserviced island.

Sorted.

chunkylover53 said:
Why does it matter? Why does it matter?

Yeah. Let's just ignore international law.

Let's drop anyone everywhere we feel like it.

In that case. Libya has a refugee. Said refugee decides he wants to pledge allegiance to the UK. Libya decides to drop him in Warwickshire despite him never having been there. Is that ok?

Haway man. You're a smart lad. You get this.
Click to expand...

I don't think Libya have the infrastructure to do that. We on the other hand do, as a world leading military power.
 
Frijj said:
If it doesn't already exist, introduce legislation to strip British citizenship from anyone found guilty of plotting terror.

Put them on a ship to a remote, unserviced island.

Sorted.



I don't think Libya have the infrastructure to do that. We on the other hand do, as a world leading military power.
Click to expand...

I really hope you are being facetious and playing to the galleries. I find it hard to compute that you are this stupid.
 
dixonsafc said:
How are you going to open these negotiations to transport people to a country which doesn't exist?

How are going to get around international law?

What are you going to do with terrorists who don't support ISIS? How are you going to have consistency across all terrorist activity?
Click to expand...

Negotiations? I'm pretty sure the Navy have boats. I mean once the Tories are done with the Navy they might have to borrow a steam trawler but as of now we still have some boats left.

International law? I'm sure the toothless UN will be foaming. They have the Saudis on their human rights commission I believe so they're hardly one to talk.

Terrorists who aren't pledging allegiance to another state/pseudostate will have to be dealt with differently.

dixonsafc said:
I really hope you are being facetious and playing to the galleries. I find it hard to compute that you are this stupid.
Click to expand...

Am I supposed to be bothered by this?
 
Frijj said:
Negotiations? I'm pretty sure the Navy have boats. I mean once the Tories are done with the Navy they might have to borrow a steam trawler but as of now we still have some boats left.

International law? I'm sure the toothless UN will be foaming. They have the Saudis on their human rights commission I believe so they're hardly one to talk.

Terrorists who aren't pledging allegiance to another state/pseudostate will have to be dealt with differently.
Click to expand...

Is 'they have boats' your argument? :lol:
 
Frijj said:
Negotiations? I'm pretty sure the Navy have boats. I mean once the Tories are done with the Navy they might have to borrow a steam trawler but as of now we still have some boats left.

International law? I'm sure the toothless UN will be foaming. They have the Saudis on their human rights commission I believe so they're hardly one to talk.

Terrorists who aren't pledging allegiance to another state/pseudostate will have to be dealt with differently.



Am I supposed to be bothered by this?
Click to expand...

No, it's just baffling how stupid your idea is and your attempt to back it by saying stick em on a boat and dump it somewhere.

It's like reading the Facebook comments on a Daily Mail article from a bloke with a poppy as his avatar.
 
chunkylover53 said:
Jesus Christ
Click to expand...

If you'd prefer we kept terrorists in this country at your expense then be my guest.

If you think that's the best way to go, great.

I don't.

dixonsafc said:
No, it's just baffling how stupid your idea is and your attempt to back it by saying stick em on a boat and dump it somewhere.

It's like reading the Facebook comments on a Daily Mail article from a bloke with a poppy as his avatar.
Click to expand...

Well you're welcome to disagree mate. I'm fine sitting here soaking up the vitriol.

dixonsafc said:
Is 'they have boats' your argument? :lol:
Click to expand...

Well you did ask how we'd get them there.
 
Frijj said:
If you'd prefer we kept terrorists in this country at your expense then be my guest.

If you think that's the best way to go, great.

I don't.



Well you're welcome to disagree mate. I'm fine sitting here soaking up the vitriol.



Well you did ask how we'd get them there.
Click to expand...

Vitriol :lol:
 
Frijj said:
If you'd prefer we kept terrorists in this country at your expense then be my guest.

If you think that's the best way to go, great.

I don't.



Well you're welcome to disagree mate. I'm fine sitting here soaking up the vitriol.



Well you did ask how we'd get them there.
Click to expand...
Your MBH act is pretty good now
 
Frijj said:
I'm also happy to have them sent away to a remote island.
Click to expand...

The best solution. If not, liberals will just keep on coming out with the same waffle each time a terrorist atrocity happens. After all, they don't offer successful solutions other than label anyone else who does have a decent idea on how to handle the situation as Islamophobes.
 
dixonsafc said:
Vitriol :lol:
Click to expand...

You do seem fairly angry.
chunkylover53 said:
Your MBH act is pretty good now
Click to expand...

It's not like it could ever happen. We're part of the ECHR.

Any other way of dealing with terrorism is expensive and probably ineffective.

If we keep them here we run the risk of them radicalising other prisoners. We also have to pay for their upkeep and healthcare the rest of their lives.

If we deport them then of course there are many issues.

If someone wants to destroy this country and kill its citizens, how do you deal with them? I really cannot see any way in which those people can ever be part of society which leads me to either lifetime imprisonment or deportation.
 
Frijj said:
You do seem fairly angry.


It's not like it could ever happen. We're part of the ECHR.

Any other way of dealing with terrorism is expensive and probably ineffective.

If we keep them here we run the risk of them radicalising other prisoners. We also have to pay for their upkeep and healthcare the rest of their lives.

If we deport them then of course there are many issues.

If someone wants to destroy this country and kill its citizens, how do you deal with them? I really cannot see any way in which those people can ever be part of society which leads me to either lifetime imprisonment or deportation.
Click to expand...

Not in the slightest, I think your suggestions absolutely hilarious.
 
chunkylover53 said:
Well that's not good enough

Syria is still a state. You can't chuck British citizens at it

But you continue to appease to the daily mail crew mate. You're smarter than that
Click to expand...
So what do you suggest should be done with people who are intent on causing harm to normal people, just going about their normal day to day lives.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top