They don't though. There are several areas Jobe excels - aerially, long passing, duels won and there are several where Neil does. Most of them are very close though.
Dan Neil had more touches per game, was dispossessed less, won slightly less duels, made more interceptions, made more recoveries and dribbled past more players
But then Dan Neil played 3882 mins making 1612 accurate passes in 2531 touches to Jobe's 1358 and 3507 mins and 2240 touches.
A lot of it is in the interpretation of the actual stats, they were extremely close. I'm not the one saying Jobe was miles ahead- and he wasnt and I never thought he was as a footballer.
We wore Sheffield United down. In the first half Jobe and Le Fee couldn't get on the ball, United swarmed our midfield and denied us time and space. Neil was the one composed in midfield who kept things flowing and spread play making United chase. He didn't control it, but he absolutely played his part.
He was taken off with cramp as Sheffield were tiring maasovely and had subbed the likes of Hamer. That allowed us to move Le Fee and Jobe back, allowing Watson and Roberts the space they wouldn't have had earlier in the game.
I have absolutely no problem with that - we have moved on tenfold. Neil like Jobe probably isn't and likely never will be a PL player- neither have enough.