The point though mate is that just because you think it isn't going away doesn't mean people shouldn't point out how bad it is for the game.
It basically renders any restructure like this pointless because we'll always end up with something daft.
I don't agree with the abuse either but if he wanted to do a truly objective assessment and set of recommendations into changes that would make England the best in all forms of the game, he could have omitted The Hundred if he really wanted to.
I'm not saying that at all, I think you misunderstand me
Just saying it wasnt part of the review, so judging every coment on move with "get rid of the 100" is not really productive
I agree that people shouldnt just accept it, no cricket in august is ridiculous, I think local red ball cricket could work though personally...as I say Durham v Yorkshire at Scarborough etc would be mint.
Kent and Middlesex early statements suggest they'll vote against it
yeah no chance this gets voted through, the question is what is the compromise.
It might be the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Filling the peak summer months with friendlies made up of the players left behind while the rest play a different sport. I'm almost interested in seeing how they try to justify it.
Dont agree on that point, dont have to be friendlies, can give them some context. Think it could be exciting.
They arent gonna play CC in August, the 100 is on, I know thats shit but thats just the reality so untill that goes, and that broadcast deal ends its about finding a work around.
Even people like Harmy, who is against the 100, has talked up that one proposal
The only alternative is the 50 over cup in August I guess, because they cant have the blast really.