So is Michael Vaughan.
No evidence except the two corroborating eyewitness accounts.
three.
Two that corroborate the first.
What Vaughan has written there is positive towards asian players rather than negative.
That's what I was thinking, or am I missing something?
Rashid, Rafiq and Naved-ul-Hasan
Yes. No-one is pointing to the passage in his book for corroboration that he was racist. We have that, and he's hardly going to be racist in his book. What it shows is that it's an event that was noteworthy to him so he can't say he has no recollection of it.
Yeah, I'm just saying that there was an initial claim where it was one person's word against another and now there have been two corroborations of that (three people in total)
Yeah but Vaughan said he couldn't remember the event... Yet it's in a book. He isn't gonna be racist in a book.
I think it’s to do with the slurry of tweets that have racist undertones.
Sorry yeah, you're completely correct. I blame the lack of coffee on this Monday morning!
well it’s 3 versions against 1. Then when you factor in he’s a right winger, anti immigration, tweeted that he would need to learn a new language to be understood in London, suggested Moeen should be asking random Asians in they are terrorists and was alone in defending De Kock during the World Cup then it’s easy to see why people might not take his side on this.
Fair enough
) what's coming to him Yes. You’re ignoring the corroborating witnesses. Can’t imagine why that would be.
They both white so he would have enjoyed itYou must be logged on to see media items
Looks like he’s off to the ashes still
“"It is difficult to comment on that except to say it hurts me hugely to think I potentially affected someone.”
He is a Sheff Wed fan though
