• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC/Sportwashing

Status
Not open for further replies.

They’ll likely go down anyway this season. If it does go through I can see them getting rid of Bruce and appointing some obscure foreigner who takes them down.
daveydavey said:
Football doesn't really get me going anymore, although I love watching games like Liverpool V Man City at the weekend gone. But the connection to SAFC has been frayed over recent years, starting with Drumavile leaving and getting progressively worse... and I can wholeheartedly say that a regime like the Saudi's taking over SAFC would completely isolate me.

If NUFC fans are happy then who are we to judge , good luck to them, but it wouldn't be for me. How can you be part of a "club" in in such circumstances? Same goes for City, PSG etc etc..
Click to expand...
Thanks to FFP it’s impossible to do a Man City or PSG anyway
 
Last edited:
FulwellViaLeeds said:
Obviously, a part of me wants Ashley to stay forever, but a part of me remains quite intrigued about the whole thing. Once again, we've slipped back into the same old tactic of 18 months ago of getting the fans' hopes up through loads of off the record briefings. Given how much Staveley and co. crowed on about the takeover the first time around, you'd think they'd learn their lesson and wait until the takeover was over the line.

As usual, there's no mention of any kind of plans - they've had 18 months to think this through, yet there's been zero detail on what they're actually going to do once they're through the door.

And also as usual, the Saudis still can't even bring themselves to publicly mention that they want to buy an overseas football club. Clearly they do, but it's weird that it doesn't ever seem to warrant a mention when they reveal their long-term plans for sport.

It's basically a circus already.



Now deleted from the article. How funny.
Click to expand...
Honestly it's like throwing a stick for a hungry dog that's expecting a treat it's a distraction, but it keeps falling for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaz
From the Chronics own article, am I missing something here?

"Of course, arbitration - according to the Premier League's QC Adrian Lewis, at least - will centre around one issue: whether there is seperation between the PIF and Saudi state. Today's news does not, on the face of it, alter that. But things have shifted with today's news."
 
0321safc said:
They’ll likely go down anyway this season. If it does go through I can see them getting rid of Bruce and appointing some obscure foreigner who takes them down.

Thanks to FFP it’s impossible to do a Man City or PSG anyway
Click to expand...
I don't think that's ever existed tbh
 
danbob said:
From the Chronics own article, am I missing something here?

"Of course, arbitration - according to the Premier League's QC Adrian Lewis, at least - will centre around one issue: whether there is seperation between the PIF and Saudi state. Today's news does not, on the face of it, alter that. But things have shifted with today's news."
Click to expand...

Was thinking the same. I dont see how this changes the separation thing.
 
daveydavey said:
Football doesn't really get me going anymore, although I love watching games like Liverpool V Man City at the weekend gone. But the connection to SAFC has been frayed over recent years, starting with Drumavile leaving and getting progressively worse... and I can wholeheartedly say that a regime like the Saudi's taking over SAFC would completely isolate me.

If NUFC fans are happy then who are we to judge , good luck to them, but it wouldn't be for me. How can you be part of a "club" in in such circumstances? Same goes for City, PSG etc etc..
Click to expand...
I agree mate. Personally I don't think it will go through. More than anything I think you have the 6 into 4 doesn't go but the big 5 and spurs are used to accepting them odds and have done for a good number of years. Make it 4 into 7 and it becomes a no no with villa Everton trying to catch up it stretches the odds even more that's what it boils down to. The murder of the journalist is unacceptable as I'd 900 plus people dying of slave labour on Quatari world cup stadiums where does it stop I mean I bet Chelsea's owner made his living from laying bricks on building site. The American owners will be squeaky clean and Chinese my god how I wish for the 1970 80s without the violence and no live matches bar the cup final and England v Scotland
 
Gill1000 said:
I agree mate. Personally I don't think it will go through. More than anything I think you have the 6 into 4 doesn't go but the big 5 and spurs are used to accepting them odds and have done for a good number of years. Make it 4 into 7 and it becomes a no no with villa Everton trying to catch up it stretches the odds even more that's what it boils down to. The murder of the journalist is unacceptable as I'd 900 plus people dying of slave labour on Quatari world cup stadiums where does it stop I mean I bet Chelsea's owner made his living from laying bricks on building site. The American owners will be squeaky clean and Chinese my god how I wish for the 1970 80s without the violence and no live matches bar the cup final and England v Scotland
Click to expand...
Eh? 😂
 
cluffy said:
Oh aye sure. But there's only so many trophies. And it took time before city won stuff.
There'll be a period of time where Bin Salman - already about as popular as Harold Shipman or Fred West - has his profile raised and people will object the world over whilst the Mags are drawing with Crystal Palace.
who knows? TBH it all sounds daft to me. :lol:
Click to expand...
Be very interesting watching matters unfold. As it stands PIF publicly walked away from the deal over one year ago sighting the length of time and the change in the global financial situation. Additionally the legal reason the PL board said matters could not proceed remains entirely unchanged. Let's say PIF might be back at the table and somehow the PL legal advice has changed, what then? By the time the legals with the PL are done the actual deal itself has then to recommence, the mags could well be relegated by then. If the legal path has been cleared there may be better options than buying a championship club. However more broadly just owing a PL club in England is the goal for PIF, the sports whitewash complete! The overall goal for the KSA, accepted as part of UK elite sport, reputation cleansed.

PIF is by definition also trying to generate future economic benefits and income streams, not sure that squares with owning a PL club. They'd need to invest more than they'd ever get in return, how much spend needed to break top 4, half a billion straight off the bat with no guarantee of success.
 
sofatester said:
I don't think that's ever existed tbh
Click to expand...
Clubs can’t just exponentially increase their wage bill like before, they’ll be restricted in what they can do, even if it’s intended to be the most ambitious takeover of all time, they’ve got a load of mediocre players on long term deals.
 
Looks like the mags have won the lottery the lucky feckers. Who knows how the Saudis will go about running the club but I doubt they've bought them just to make the numbers up in the premier League

They have a better chance in the future of winning trophies but what I will say is that I still think it's difficult no matter how much money you have to sign and persuade the very best players to move to the north east
 
Quote from the Mag. Could this be Mike upping his game?



You must be logged on to see external links

  • You must be logged on to see external links
    You must be logged on to see external links
    edited
    Every time the team is relegation bound theres takeover talk.
    Manufactured by Keith Bishop Associates as a pure distraction

 
danbob said:
From the Chronics own article, am I missing something here?

"Of course, arbitration - according to the Premier League's QC Adrian Lewis, at least - will centre around one issue: whether there is seperation between the PIF and Saudi state. Today's news does not, on the face of it, alter that. But things have shifted with today's news."
Click to expand...
Daily mail and telegraph saying they don't need to prove it now. That was only to seperate Blame for the piracy
 
So have the premier League been vindicated if this goes through. The Saudis have now admitted piracy issues and paid bein for it

The Saudis look like the ones who were corrupt and have admitted it and now the premier League look like they will pass it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top