Harry Angstrom
Striker
Yes. Have you got any?Would statistics help?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. Have you got any?Would statistics help?
Lol.
Where in the name of fuck did I say that coppers we’re going out of their way to kill black people?It did have data on it. I'll give you that. I'm just surprised you back up an assertion with a wiki article.
I am aware you are a lot more likely to die from shooting in USA if you are black. I'm not convinced the coppers are going out of their way to kill blacks.
Also why is questioning stuff being contrary? There is a load of utter shite bandied about that has no substance behind it.
They aren't? They just do it by accident?Where in the name of fuck did I say that coppers we’re going out of their way to kill black people?
Tell me where I said it.They aren't? They just do it by accident?
Thought better of you mind than to hold a wiki page up as proofYou said you’d like to see the stats. I gave you the stats.
Please.Tell me where I said it.
ffs, just spat my tea out! That's class Have a 'Like'.
Stop deflecting or bugger off.Please.
You see those little footnotes at the bottom?Thought better of you mind than to hold a wiki page up as proof
Deary me. If you don't want to discuss stuff just don't discuss it, instead of stamping your foot.Stop deflecting or bugger off.
Deary me. If you don't want to discuss stuff just don't discuss it, instead of stamping your foot.
You lost this one pet.
You believe whatever you like.
You lost this one pet.
I know. each page comes with a qualifying bibliography but it still seems strange that an editable page is often given over as proofStop deflecting or bugger off.
You see those little footnotes at the bottom?
And editable page with sources.I know. each page comes with a qualifying bibliography but it still seems strange that an editable page is often given over as proof
Mind i suppose ONS, US counterparts other pages are editable somewhere along the lineAnd editable page with sources.
Everything’s editable by someone.Mind i suppose ONS, US counterparts other pages are editable somewhere along the line
It mentions it in the article that he linked to in the OP.Not denying this but what is your source? I have not read any reports on the ethnicity of the shooter
Nothing to do with being black. oh no.But the whole argument of the gun lot in America is that, rather than reducing the number of guns, we should just make sure they all the good people have them too so they can protect people if there is a shooting. Too early to tell for certain what's happened in this case but sounds like there's been a shooting, it's possible this lad has done exactly that (got his gun out to defend people) and they've shot him. It makes a mockery of the whole good guys with guns argument.
Whether the colour of his skin was a factor in the officer shooting him is open to debate, but it wouldn't be a surprise if an officer sees a black lad with a gun and automatically thinks "that'll be the shooter", the police force obviously did since they raised their statement before realising they made a mistake, you can't discount the idea that the colour of his skin might have been a factor there
These were in the bbc article someone linked earlier in the thread:I'd be interested in those stats.