Coming from a man that thought he had two stomachs, really makes me believe in this.
Is he part man part cow?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Coming from a man that thought he had two stomachs, really makes me believe in this.
Well this morning there was 2 of them big cherry pickers extended fully up to the top.
Is that still them painting?
Fuck do you know? I want @forest gumps opinion.The main pylon is a distinct structure relative to the bridge deck. Any differential movement due to coefficient of thermal expansion of the steelwork will be taken within the catenary action of the cable stays.
The bridge deck should have expansion joints as this will also expand in Warner temperatures, but this is in the horizontal and will normally be at the abutments then at set centres along the deck. The two above have no bearing on each other.
I'm sure the foundation under the pylon is piled, so unless there is some form of failure, that will not move, not even due to consolidation beneath the found.
There are far bigger steel structures which do not include expansion joints as this is generally dealt with within the design.
All welds should have been fully NDT'd before it left the yard for the UK, so if a well has failed, then it's most likely a design fault where the load path calculation isn't correct, but I can't imagine that is the case, mainly as the bridge isn't open yet so the loading to date is less than design load and factors of safety.
You'd also see welders up there if they were repairing welds.
In summary, he's full of shite.
I'd suggest this is too specialised for BC and the council will have appointed a third party independent.
But apart from that....The main pylon is a distinct structure relative to the bridge deck. Any differential movement due to coefficient of thermal expansion of the steelwork will be taken within the catenary action of the cable stays.
The bridge deck should have expansion joints as this will also expand in Warner temperatures, but this is in the horizontal and will normally be at the abutments then at set centres along the deck. The two above have no bearing on each other.
I'm sure the foundation under the pylon is piled, so unless there is some form of failure, that will not move, not even due to consolidation beneath the found.
There are far bigger steel structures which do not include expansion joints as this is generally dealt with within the design.
All welds should have been fully NDT'd before it left the yard for the UK, so if a well has failed, then it's most likely a design fault where the load path calculation isn't correct, but I can't imagine that is the case, mainly as the bridge isn't open yet so the loading to date is less than design load and factors of safety.
You'd also see welders up there if they were repairing welds.
In summary, he's full of shite.
I'd suggest this is too specialised for BC and the council will have appointed a third party independent.
That’s a tad aggressive. Anyway, @Forrest Gump sells bits of plastic. Kna’s nowt.Fuck do you know? I want @forest gumps opinion.
Snake oil is what I heard.That’s a tad aggressive. Anyway, @Forrest Gump sells bits of plastic. Kna’s nowt.
^^^^^ Sells plastic.
What’s a skidSnake oil is what I heard.
Think you've been whooshed there.
You couldn’t tell me.^^^^
What’s a skid
You couldn’t tell me.
What on earth does that mean?
Building control were deffo on there as me mate was scaffolding in there and he said he was a pain in the arse. But as you say it may have been a third party.The main pylon is a distinct structure relative to the bridge deck. Any differential movement due to coefficient of thermal expansion of the steelwork will be taken within the catenary action of the cable stays.
The bridge deck should have expansion joints as this will also expand in Warner temperatures, but this is in the horizontal and will normally be at the abutments then at set centres along the deck. The two above have no bearing on each other.
I'm sure the foundation under the pylon is piled, so unless there is some form of failure, that will not move, not even due to consolidation beneath the found.
There are far bigger steel structures which do not include expansion joints as this is generally dealt with within the design.
All welds should have been fully NDT'd before it left the yard for the UK, so if a well has failed, then it's most likely a design fault where the load path calculation isn't correct, but I can't imagine that is the case, mainly as the bridge isn't open yet so the loading to date is less than design load and factors of safety.
You'd also see welders up there if they were repairing welds.
In summary, he's full of shite.
I'd suggest this is too specialised for BC and the council will have appointed a third party independent.
You took a sarcastic comment literally as it went over your head
Building control were deffo on there as me mate was scaffolding in there and he said he was a pain in the arse. But as you say it may have been a third party.
I actually wondered about this as I’ve dealt with some right tools. Normally through Newcastle. Some good ones too like.I meant more along the lines of approval stage. Once the drawings are complete issued AFC then normal BC will be checking the build is in accordance.
Dint need to knar now anyhow. So proper not boshed.I could