Buildings don't fall down just because they're on fire pt911

Status
Not open for further replies.


Paddy O'Dors said:
I wouldn't mind the politics coming back now.

I can remember when this place only had two boards ffs!
Click to expand...
I think breaking down the board fosters a sub mentality which then becomes dominant, look at the way the shit from the politics forum spills onto here... guilty as charged anarl like but I'm just a victim of the circumstances :lol:
 
Cowvahlo said:
The other story is that it was done to destroy files the CIA were holding and going to use in several high profile court cases that were going to cost some high profile companies an awful lot of money, damage reputations and send people to prison for a long long time.
Click to expand...

Aye, that's the easiest way to get rid of bits of paper I heard.

Every time we have a clear out at work we organise a high scale terror attack next door hoping our building gets damaged, set on fire and collapses. Very efficient method of disposing of documents there mate.
 
TwasOnTheFifthOfMay said:
Which elite was this? The other rich people you mentioned earlier?


You've changed man. Youmademerealise would never have stooped to pathetic ego-boosting stunts like this :(
Click to expand...
Trump isn't the elite mate, he's a relative Chav when it comes to the elite

ravydavygravy said:
Aye, that's the easiest way to get rid of bits of paper I heard.

Every time we have a clear out at work we organise a high scale terror attack next door hoping our building gets damaged, set on fire and collapses. Very efficient method of disposing of documents there mate.
Click to expand...
Bits of paper? What about banks of servers? Slightly harder to run those through shredder.
 
Last edited:
Cowvahlo said:
I've mentioned this on a thread previously, thats not necessarily the case...take war for example, thousand of people are sent to war, to kill, bomb and fight under the name of a certain cause. Those people follow the orders blindly. The orders and the decision to go to war is taken by relatively few people.

The point is people will do what they are told to do if they believe in a cause. It doesnt take thousands of people to do something like this.
Click to expand...

Surely you aren't suggesting that out of a cast of thousands nobody would have been overcome by guilt/turned to God/flipped out and blabbed?
 
Last edited:
ProfessionalMackem said:
Some good questions which I have pondered over

First question.
Put simply mate. It's money. We had a good discussion on this in the last thread about Larry silverstein. Follow the money.

Here's a good vid on it mate.

Second question. This one is tougher to answer as you have to try and put yourself in their minds. I will try though. Right. One relatively big attack is better than smaller ones is down to a few reasons. First of all they needed a big paradym shift in human consciousness to getaway with eroding so many liberties and freedoms in a short space of time eg patriot act. To get away with making new departments to drain even more money from populace like department of homeland security etc. They detailed this all in the pnac document.

Your last sentence I don't agree with mate. Nee way these rag tag operation from a cave could've pulled off this job......without help.
Click to expand...
Can you outline what liberties and freedoms we have lost since 911?
 
cosmicchris00 said:
Surely you aren't suggesting that out of a cast of thousands nobody would have been overcome by guilt/turned to God/flipped out and blabbed?
Click to expand...
Here we go, people bandy about this 'thousands of people involved', why does there have to be that many people involved?

The purpose of the plot will have been known by only a few, from then on in its pretty easy to direct your foot troops to do your dirty work.
 
ravydavygravy said:
Why didn't they just destroy them normally then? Seems a bit batshit mental to destroy a building to destroy a hard disc, sorry bank of servers.

wibble
Click to expand...
So the CIA are just going to let a group of people in and destroy their servers?

'Hew marra, me gaffer is going to be up on some pretty hefty charges, is it alright if I come in and smash the place up so he gets off?'

'Aye, nee bother, gan for it, its not as if we're a law enforcement agency or anything'
 
Cowvahlo said:
So the CIA are just going to let a group of people in and destroy their servers?

'Hew marra, me gaffer is going to be up on some pretty hefty charges, is it alright if I come in and smash the place up so he gets off?'

'Aye, nee bother, gan for it, its not as if we're a law enforcement agency or anything'
Click to expand...

So the top boys in the CIA that organised 9/11 don't have access to their own computers?

I think you're onto a loser here marra.
 

Buildings just don't fall down due to fire, certainly not straight down like the above

Must be a controlled demolition - the Iranians are trying to erode the freedoms of their people and planned the false flag building collapse.

It's the only rational explanation.
 
GK said:

Buildings just don't fall down due to fire, certainly not straight down like the above

Must be a controlled demolition - the Iranians are trying to erode the freedoms of their people and planned the false flag building collapse.

It's the only rational explanation.
Click to expand...

Bet that bloke in the cherry picker browned his pants.
 
ravydavygravy said:
So the top boys in the CIA that organised 9/11 don't have access to their own computers?

I think you're onto a loser here marra.
Click to expand...
Who says it was the CIA that organised it? Let your imagination run wild for a second here and that me and you want to get rid of some exceptionally dodgy information that is going to send us to prison for a long time and wipe out our collective fortune.

We look at the first option, we need to delete the information from the servers...too risky, someone has got to be in there to do it.

Or we have a mate who owns the building where the servers are, he fancies redeveloping the whole area but knows he'll never be able to do it. He's already got a plan to destroy the surrounding buildings and claim the insurance money. He tells us of a plan where its going to be risk free for us, a group of towheaded cave dwellers are going to take the blame why don't we piggy back on his plan.

Sounds like a no brainer to me.

What should we do?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top