And if I worshipped the work of say Richard 3rd you'd take issue.
I'm not twisting what they do at all.
Mackems have access to it!
You are. It's a very obvious example that Daesh do not practice what Mo preached. Only a bigot would disagree with that obvious example....shirley.
Why do you think islamic state do not practice what mohammed preached?
Because they are religious fascists/Nazis/bigots?
And Mohammed wasn't?
He was a revolutionary who did nothing that the other empires weren't doing at that time.And Mohammed wasn't?
What? You're delusional......
The point is that Christians, etc have done the same, it's not an exclusive Muslim trait. FFS the Gods Chosen People bollocks is central to Judaism.
He kept power for himself and told his followers that they were superior to other peoples.
Those other peoples were killed or enslaved through open warfare.
He created an empire ruling over the conquered lands of those who were not considered part of this special group of people
Who am I talking about Hitler or Mohammed?
What did Hitler do differently that makes him a fascist/nazi/bigot and not mohammed?
No one's saying they haven't.
Historical relativism. You judge a historical character by the times of the day not by someone who lived 1300 years later.
He kept power for himself and told his followers that they were superior to other peoples.
Those other peoples were killed or enslaved through open warfare.
He created an empire ruling over the conquered lands of those who were not considered part of this special group of people
Who am I talking about Hitler or Mohammed?
What did Hitler do differently that makes him a fascist/nazi/bigot and not mohammed?
Well that's complete bollocks isn't it.
I don't. He was a man of his time...that's all.
So what. Yeah he started another religion. Big deal.
No wonder you're blushing. You are all over the place.
Where do you think Islamic state gets the idea from for a caliphate in the first place?
Blushing for you being ridiculous. I'd dash away as well.
Jesus have you still got that head of yours in the sand
Don't be silly. These acts are just a small part of the offensive. Most of it is done with money, politics, and the internet. You carry on believing what you what you want though.
Ermm, no I won't.
No, that's not what I meant either.
They're not the only European leaders having a shite time either. It's not a coincidence that these things happen at similar times to the when leaders are under fire, and the chances of regime change can be made possible.
Mo was no worse than others around him. That's not bending backwards, it's just not having a skewed and bigoted view of history. The terrorists he 'inspires' today are out of step with ordinary muslims today. That's why the whole world apart from a few idiots regard them as extremists rather than having any real legitimate claim to Mo's legacy.
During that time and for a millennium afterwards religion was always politics no matter what the religion. It's the first thing you're told. Again. You've just got a Neslonian blindness to everything else that doesn't support your view. Mohammed was no worse than any other ruler with empirical aspirations.Jesus have you still got that head of yours in the sand
All the best religions pursued an Empire. All? You sure about that?
There's not a single religion other than Islam that has a POLITICAL endgame of total world domination. And the only way that that goal can be reached was through violent Jihad...as practised and preached by Mohammed. This is not even in dispute man ffs...have you genuinely any concept of what utter carnage and death was wrought on Indian Hindus or the unimaginable genocide perpetrated upon Zoroastrians in Persia.
You give me a single example of anything that IS preaches that cannot be taken as a literal interpretation of the Qur'an and Hadith....ill save you the trouble, you can't.
