Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I couldn't care less whether global audiences like the Aussie programs I'm $300 better off without a tv licence.Many ABC programmes good enough to interest the global market, out of interest?
I don't use social services or the armed services but have to pay for it, shall we got shot of them too?I'm not opposed to paying for it, I'm against having to pay for it whether or not I choose to watch it.
No longer a supporter of the BBC. It is riddled with Conservative Party placemen.No it shouldn't, the people who want this generally want our media to be exclusively fed through the filters of media sources owned by billionaires. Or at least they've bought in to their bullshit.
That's filmed live in front of a studio audience in MBH's front room iirc
Don’t you just pay it in tax instead?I couldn't care less whether global audiences like the Aussie programs I'm $300 better off without a tv licence.
So it's a bag of shite then?I couldn't care less whether global audiences like the Aussie programs I'm $300 better off without a tv licence.
Do you need a license if you're just watching pre-recorded stuff (with the exception of iPlayer)?
Don’t you just pay it in tax instead?
Yes. If you have a television, you need a television licence.
Couple of points.
News and current affairs - tell me someone who does it as well or better
Salaries - you really think the commercial sector is cheaper?
It is indeedThe TV licence is an extremely regressive levy on the average punter.
Nope.
It's only if you watch live tv on any device or any BBC catch up stuff.
And Sky News? You really think that isn’t more biased?News and current affairs? The BBC does not even try now to hide it's political bias. Many who have left have confirmed this as the default position, not that it needs confirming.
Try this. Read the Guardian every day for a month say, (a very big ask I know, but it's free as no one will pay for it) . Then compare the stories, the running order, the slant placed, and the time given to viewpoints of opposing points of view with thoseton the BBC. They are usually close to identical, and the Guardian makes no secret of it's political stance. Likewise, on Europe, where it has long since abandoned any sense of objectivity although since it has recieved millions of pounds directly from the EU perhaps that should not be surprising.
As for salaries. If they earn them in the real world the company will thrive and profit. If not they will be out; the company cannot keep losing money. The BBC faces no such discipline and hands over vast salaries with no risk at all.
That is my reason for wanting it scrapped. A tax funded news service and a subscription based service for other stuff would be my solution.It is indeed
Can’t really argue with thatThat is my reason for wanting it scrapped. A tax funded news service and a subscription based service for other stuff would be my solution.