D
Deleted member 27423
Guest
He really did not.Watmore did better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He really did not.Watmore did better.
I thought Watmore helped England win a World Cup
Exactly mate. You cannot possibly judge him on the minutes he was on the pitch yesterday but that’s some posters on this forum.Aye, after seeing the lad with the ball at his feet for about 3.2 seconds, I’m convinced he’s absolutely shite.
Jesus wept man.
Watmore did better.
Yeah, he showed some really nice touches on the brief occasions he had the ball.All three subs were so late it's hard to pass judgement, but he was certainly the most heavily involved of the three and showed some skills.
Mate your ridiculous you think it’s footy manager man where you just throw people in willy nillyyou clearly are unable to comprehend what i am saying, even though i've practically repeated the same post 3 or 4 times.
do you think last nights performance was with without fault?
Yep and that includes Grigg and KimpiokaWatmore is easily the worst attacking option in the squad. Woeful
Mate your ridiculous you think it’s footy manager man where you just throw people in willy nilly
Watmore did better.
That was it for me. The new bloke didn't get much opportunity to do owt but looked keen.Do you think so? I didn't remember him getting that much of the ball, but there was certainly a couple of 'almost became a chances' he was key in.. Might be a bit of me noticing the new boy's activity more to be fair.
Hope so mate.I reckon he will come good for us bit pace in middle
Agreed. Also, has anyone noticed the quality of his finishing in the warm ups? (Probably doesn't mean much, mind).Yeah, he showed some really nice touches on the brief occasions he had the ball.