Semenyo

[McMackem]

All three subs were so late it's hard to pass judgement, but he was certainly the most heavily involved of the three and showed some skills.

 

[The Butcher]

Yeah was busy, showed dome good touches and tried to go forward. Positive.

 

[Abu Dhabi Red and White]

All three subs were so late it's hard to pass judgement, but he was certainly the most heavily involved of the three and showed some skills.

Watmore did better.

 

[naughtynose]

Looks to have a footballing brain which instantly makes him a better option than Watmore.

 

[10 Gary Rowells]

Watmore did better.

You're just on a wind up. Semenyo looked good when he came on, Watmore looked tripe and did nowt. Very promising from Semenyo - some skill, lots of pace and got stuck in.

 

[Abu Dhabi Red and White]

You're just on a wind up. Semenyo looked good when he came on, Watmore looked tripe and did nowt. Very promising from Semenyo - some skill, lots of pace and got stuck in.

Eh?

 

[WildinHetton]

Watmore did better.

Did he fuck.

 

[LineTrash]

Thought he put himself about and was good with the ball...like to see a longer run out.

 

[KGC83]

Watmore did better.

No he didn’t

 

[No. 1 is Gary Rowell]

Watmore did better.

He didn't mind.

 

[callum]

Looks to have a footballing brain which instantly makes him a better option than Watmore.

Watmore is easily the worst attacking option in the squad. Woeful

 

[stupeo]

I thought Watmore helped England win a World Cup

 

[10 Gary Rowells]

Eh?

Watmore was very poor when he came on - he did nothing positive. Semenyo did well - seems the general consensus on here and my view.

 

[tunstallhill]

You have never seen them play for us or even in this formation yet you want people from a winning team dropped who have just beat probably the best team in the league like I said Dobson is a booking away from a suspension anyway why would you want to drop him when it’s going to happen naturally

you clearly are unable to comprehend what i am saying, even though i've practically repeated the same post 3 or 4 times.

do you think last nights performance was with without fault?

 

[PitYackerMackem]

Showed flashes of his potential. Great turn in the middle of the park. Looks like he has a lot of pace in his locker. As others of said should of been on a lot sooner. His positioning was a bit off but to be expected for a young lad learning the system. Dunc awful.

 

[OohBaldyBally]

Watmore did better.

I think you were watching a different game to me then mate.

It’s funny how opinions differ (and I’m certainly not saying that your opinion is wrong) but I thought he was poor when he came on.

 

[SAFC_Jack]

Watmore did better.

His second touch is a tackle.

 

[Helmerroids]

Showed flashes of his potential. Great turn in the middle of the park. Looks like he has a lot of pace in his locker. As others of said should of been on a lot sooner. His positioning was a bit off but to be expected for a young lad learning the system. Dunc awful.

This, lovely skills in the middle to set up an attack, the lad definitely has potential. Maguire and Gooch are really putting shifts in, we’re going to need good backup from the bench if/when they get peggered after 70mins.

 

[Billy Batts]

I've been one of Watmores biggest supporters on here over the years but dear me, he was awful when he came on. Although tbf, as usual, Parkinson makes substitutions far too f***ing late. Boils my piss.

 

[phil]

Watmore came on late and looked a bit anxious to be involved and things didnt come off for him. Similarly the other lads. To be fair to Parkinson his subs weren't there to change the game, more to show to those who came on that they are in his plans and that he wants/ expects them to come good. Also taking a player off at 60 mins is implying that you are unhappy with their performance, something that he wouldn't want to have done with any of them after a great first half team performance. Think it is called man management!