Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Assuming that the ban would not be forthcoming then would you write them?I believe I said I would write up the rules but also that I would get banned for so doing
I believe I said I would write up the rules but also that I would get banned for so doing
The first rule of the SMB is that any new poster must be greeted with scorn and derision and extreme suspicion.Assuming that the ban would not be forthcoming then would you write them?
For me it would be
1. Not proofreading your initial post for spelling and grammatical errors (read my initial post).
The penalty would be twatting yourself very severely with a dictionary.
Wot sise dicktionary.Assuming that the ban would not be forthcoming then would you write them?
For me it would be
1. Not proofreading your initial post for spelling and grammatical errors (read my initial post).
The penalty would be twatting yourself very severely with a dictionary.
This is a wishlist not a listing of established rules1/ Any post that doesn’t indicate it’s initial subject matter in its title should be instantly deleted by mods. Repeat offenders to be banned for a week at a time.
2/ The word “ Mackem” should not be allowed in user names.
3/ User names should be approved by a committee/board before use. Boring ones or those too similar to others already in use should be banned. An user name list could be available for the unimaginative.
1.Given that this isn’t real life then extreme piss taking should be allowed, snowflakes and the easily offended should then go to a ‘nursery board’ to toughen upThis is a wishlist not a listing of established rules
I agree. The baptism of fire, weeds out the weak from the strong, give them the message of 'If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen'. We must keep a strong, healthy stock on here.The first rule of the SMB is that any new poster must be greeted with scorn and derision and extreme suspicion.
Ah yes a good rule to add...I agree. The baptism of fire, weeds out the weak from the strong, give them the message of 'If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen'. We must keep a strong, healthy stock on here.
Also if they are banned posters trying to make a 'Stealth' return, we must uncover their true identity of who they once were on here.
I agree, unless we all like them, eg. Professional Mackem, so help keep their identity secret from the Mods.Ah yes a good rule to add...
Rule 3 any poster attempting a stealth come back should be publicly outed at the earliest opportunity. Should the poster actually be a genuine virgin poster they should suffer this treatment in good humour.
Rule 3 caveat is redacted to prevent my being banned.
Well seeing as the mods protect some of their favourites against their own rules it is only right that we should run a resistanceI agree, unless we all like them, eg. Professional Mackem, so help keep their identity secret from the Mods.
Well seeing as the mods protect some of their favourites against their own rules it is only right that we should run a resistance
1.Given that this isn’t real life then extreme piss taking should be allowed, snowflakes and the easily offended should then go to a ‘nursery board’ to toughen up
2. Any mention of a lass should be followed up with a pic, regardless if it’s of the lass being discussed or not
3. If you post on the politics or PF for the majority of your time on here then you must go through regular (is suggest weekly) sanity checks
4. Abolish the reaction table
The fallen madonna.. And the gateau from chateau ... Oooo reneeWell seeing as the mods protect some of their favourites against their own rules it is only right that we should run a resistance