D
Deleted member 26022
Guest
Yes that thought had occured to me also, if he's rich enough to the run the football club, and has juan and his connections as back ups, then why the two loans, seems odd from my perspective.
RAWA - the voice of the people
- Thread starter 6inarow
- Start date
Yes that thought had occured to me also, if he's rich enough to the run the football club, and has juan and his connections as back ups, then why the two loans, seems odd from my perspective.
Show us where then.
samaistonsrightfoot
Striker
I have a suspicion they've spoken to him privately about putting funds into the club/taking para payments etc and he's sent them this doc to show them he's put money in himself but hasn't realised it shows he's put an interest charge on it.
They've picked up on it, he's said the charge was 'an accident', and they've pushed forward on the Donald out stuff before waiting for the meeting as had previously been planned.
Mowgli
Striker
Imagine bending over backwards to try and defend donald man. Can you not just accept he wants out asap and it has nowt to do with fans ffs
Then presented it at a public meeting, but asked nobody to say anything because they are still speaking to him about it?
Just seems totally bizarre to me.
samaistonsrightfoot
Striker
Have they asked nobody to say anything?
Mowgli
Striker
Hes had the chance to explain it clearly and hasnt. Nothing is stopping him now.
What's the odds he still ignores it and says nothing?
Simple question. You wouldn't understand though as you are one who looks for the negative in everything he does. So, for balance, some people may look for the positive. Fancy that!
Has he?
Very difficult to say without seeing it, but he has at least sent a letter. I have no clue tbh.
Apparently, I am sure someone at the meeting said that.
Definitely Maybe
Striker
There is probably a perfectly logical and above board explanation, but why is everything about as clear as mud with Donald and Methven? We were in a complete mess under Short and it was still much clearer than under these
samaistonsrightfoot
Striker
I think Guinness omitted it because he didn't understand it, rather than he was asked to. Unless I've totally missed him or someone else saying that.
It may well have been worse under previous regimes. They were much more of a closed book and didn't tell us anywhere near the amount the current lot tell us.
He said the chair asked people not to take the info out of the room.
Yeh post 498 he said the chair asked for it not to be mentioned as they were still in discussions about it.
D
Deleted member 26022
Guest
Good Point.
Botchie
Striker
What is the positive like? I class myself as pretty pragmatic, but I'm very concerned about this bloke. I've always reserved judgement as the one question he has never been able to answer is how he will fund the club beyond the parachute payments. That time is looming very large...
D
Deleted member 26022
Guest
Imagine the fallout if it was ever to be revealed SD moved that £9m from SAFC to Madrox so he could loan it back at +6.5%
Interesting point, the question i would therefore ask is, would it be possible to do just that.
He's answered it by bringing in investment. He has billions worth of wealth across a number of people invested into the club via either shares or loan/whatever.
D
Deleted member 26022
Guest
End of July i believe, when that time frame comes to an end, how will to club look then.. answers on a post card, going forward from that what happens next.
Botchie
Striker
Why did he need a loan if Jaun was so committed then? The bloke owns 20% of the club, but lives halfway around the world. He's turned up on the piss a few times with fans and is meant to be bringing same Uruguayan younguns over for the accedemy
. Meanwhile according to Donald himself (the bloke who's word you take for gospel) has said the Americans want no further involvement. Sounds solid, marra.
Last edited:
