Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm 100% sure the Earth is not a globe we supposedly walk upon. You don't know if it is a globe but are happy to accept the narrative and I fully understand that.
No you arent, you have no proof it isnt a globe.
You have a belief supported by not a single iota of evidence that we are in a cell and gravity doesnt exist.
I am 100% sure the Earth is not a spinning globe we supposedly walk upon.You are not in anyway, shape or form 100 percent sure as you have ZERO proof.
we are back on that one today.
The world can not be a globe because bath water, it shows the earth can not be a curved surface.
Except for the different type of curved surface I put forward last week, because that one is fine.
Water level is a guaranteed proof. The rest is all about applying logic to evidence that is circumstantial but some of it being, in your face.
You have no proof of your spinning globe. None.
It absolutely does. Your globe does not.
I am 100% sure the Earth is not a spinning globe we supposedly walk upon.
By all means come back with the same stuff and I'll be happy to provide you with this set of answers.
If you have any proof of your globe then show me.
Water level can be used to prove curvature, can it?No it is not, in fact water level can be used to prove curvature.
There's no curve of water on ships at a distance.I think the crux of his argument is gravity. He thinks gravity does not exist in any form so water is flat. While my beliefs is that gravity does exist even in a bath of water and due to the size of the world, no way the human eye can see the curve of a bath of water. But on a greater scale it can be seen. Ships at distance is a great example.
One can see the effect of the curvature of the earth quite easily. A ship on the horizon moving toward the viewer will gradually appear with the masts first, followed by the superstructure, then the hull.There's no curve of water on ships at a distance.
One can see the effect of the curvature of the earth quite easily.
A ship on the horizon moving toward the viewer will gradually appear with the masts first, followed by the superstructure, then the hull.
You may think you have.I have seen it with my own eyes
You need to stay of the weed mate.No, you can't.
To be expected just as it is with the sun losing the bottom first then the middle and then the top as it moves away from you and the opposite when it comes towards you and back into full view.
The ship is very similar is terms of light above trumps the light below back to your eyes.
It's just passed off as going over a curve.
The reality of something going over a convex curve would be for the stern to disappear last, not the mast.
Clearly the Earth is not a globe.
You may think you have.
Ok are we done?You need to stay of the weed mate.
Light trumps other lightYou need to stay of the weed mate.
Can we get near these icebergs though are they not in the place where man can't go and all machines cease to workA bath full of water is all that's needed to be fair but that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Apart from on your lemon squeezer map where they would be nowhere near level....Just throw a flat board in and place a digital spirit level on it for starters.
However you can also go and us a set of water level tubes over a larger distance. Or you can use a lake or even an iced
It's just passed off as going over a curve.
The reality of something going over a convex curve would be for the stern to disappear last, not the mast.
Clearly the Earth is not a globe.
You may think you have.
Ok, I think we're done.Can we get near these icebergs though are they not in the place where man can't go and all machines cease to work
Yet the indentations that would hold the sea on the gradual slope can't be seenYes, the water would be. Because it sits inside indentations. Simple logic.
On your globe with the mindset you go with, this is all that could happen.Utter rubbish, why would the stern disappear last if it was much lower than the mast (lots of masts on ships these days) absolute drivel. If the stern where the highest point it would disappear last this is entirely consistent with a curved earth
I did put thought into my last post.Ok are we done?
I thought you might have had a bit of thought on it but never mind.
You're obviously welcome to your thoughts.I did put thought into my last post.
You think I am blind to certain beliefs while I am not.
I find the question are we in a simulation very interesting and makes me think. I am 99% sure we are not in simulation and even if we are the code has given us a global earth with gravity.
Because he has no concept of scaleUtter rubbish, why would the stern disappear last if it was much lower than the mast (lots of masts on ships these days) absolute drivel. If the stern where the highest point it would disappear last this is entirely consistent with a curved earth