Police auditors



It’s ok saying ignore them, but how do you tell which one is a bored time waster and which one is recording the activities of the police station to gain information on best time to drive a truck full of explosives through the back gates?
 
TheSpitfire said:
It’s ok saying ignore them, but how do you tell which one is a bored time waster and which one is recording the activities of the police station to gain information on best time to drive a truck full of explosives through the back gates?
Click to expand...

:lol::lol:
 
pavarotti1980 said:
I know how stupid, plotting to attack a police station. Never.......

www.theguardian.com

Teenager accused of UK terror plot took photos of police station, court told

Luke Skelton, 18, allegedly carried out ‘hostile reconnaissance’ and believed he was engaged in a race war
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

Fancy that reply man :lol::lol:

Sidewinder2 said:
Deary f***ing me, the "look at me" social media generation.

Obsessed with like and subscribers.

Fuck off back under the rock you came from.

PS they are not "auditors" they are bellends with a camera
Click to expand...

This.

Its why it confuses me how some of the coppers deal with them. You see some who know that they're just muppets and have good enough understanding of the surrounding legislation to have a word, see what they're doing and let them crack on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the auditors really show up how insecure many of our police are , and how they certainly dont like folk who know their rights and stand up for them
 
Titus said:
Fancy that reply man :lol::lol:



This.

Its why it confuses me how some of the coppers deal with them. You see some who know that they're just muppets and have good enough understanding of the surrounding legislation to have a word, see what they're doing and let them crack on.
Click to expand...

Usually they're asked to speak to them. As ive already said on this thread, officers have been followed home etc before by criminals and usually officers private cars are parked amongst marked and unmarked. Not to mention there are surveillance cars that need to be hidden from public
 
pavarotti1980 said:
Then there obviously is a threat this happens and auditors/wasters (delete as appropriate) could be doing something similar to the young lad above. Hidden in plain sight and all that
Click to expand...

If people aren't acting outside of the law, you can't start demanding things that aren't required of them based on the extremely small chance that they're doing some hostile recon unfortunately.
 
Titus said:
If people aren't acting outside of the law, you can't start demanding things that aren't required of them based on the extremely small chance that they're doing some hostile recon unfortunately.
Click to expand...
How would you determine if someone was acting outside of the law or not in this scenario?
 
BlackOps said:
Usually they're asked to speak to them. As ive already said on this thread, officers have been followed home etc before by criminals and usually officers private cars are parked amongst marked and unmarked. Not to mention there are surveillance cars that need to be hidden from public
Click to expand...

Being in the police is a very risky job. I've got a firearms officer in my family. What you say is absolutely correct. Maybe a collaborative effort should be made to change the law so that what the wasters are doing is actually illegal (I know there are plenty of things that don't seem illegal that could be part of a wider plot to something), but ultimately the reason forces keep having to pay out to these numpties is because they don't handle th situation well.
 
Titus said:
Being in the police is a very risky job. I've got a firearms officer in my family. What you say is absolutely correct. Maybe a collaborative effort should be made to change the law so that what the wasters are doing is actually illegal (I know there are plenty of things that don't seem illegal that could be part of a wider plot to something), but ultimately the reason forces keep having to pay out to these numpties is because they don't handle th situation well.
Click to expand...

Again, one of the many reasons officers dont feel valued by higher powers. Too busy pointless welfare ticky box exercises. This along with changes to police drivers being held in higher regard than regular public due to training especially advanced drivers. Thats just off the top of my head. No one seems to be working towards solving these potential welfare issues
 
BlackOps said:
Again, one of the many reasons officers dont feel valued by higher powers. Too busy pointless welfare ticky box exercises. This along with changes to police drivers being held in higher regard than regular public due to training especially advanced drivers. Thats just off the top of my head. No one seems to be working towards solving these potential welfare issues
Click to expand...

Which part is this in response to? About a collaborative effort to make it illegal or the fact they often have to pay out to these sorts?
 
AC-OTM said:
I think they are class, very informative actually. They obviously are there for a reaction but if the police knew how to handle it properly the auditors wouldn't turn up. They turn up in the first place because police abuse there authorities sometimes.
Click to expand...
This is true. I don't like them and I think AB is a bit of tool. But nevertheless some of the policing is criminal.
 
pavarotti1980 said:
How would you determine if someone was acting outside of the law or not in this scenario?
Click to expand...

Are their actions directly breaking any laws? If not but still concerned they may be planning to blow up the place up, relay the information to more senior officers as intelligence. What it shouldn't turn in to is some war of egos.
 

Back
Top