Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry I may have missed this but what are the reasons for Campbell being such a bad potential owner?
Sorry I may have missed this but what are the reasons for Campbell being such a bad potential owner?
Nothing shocks me now with this greedy bastard. All he has an interest in his him self, he’d happily risk our clubs future to sell to Campbell so he can be involved. The twat is gonna be the end of us.
The trouble is the last time they did that they got all sorts of grief from other fans saying they weren’t speaking on behalf of me etc etc.
Dammed if they act, dammed if they don’t.
Could he afford to ?Unfortunately Ashley has been unpopular up the road for many years yet he’s stuck it out. Donald can do exactly the same.
Cheers mateThis is a good starting point Falkirk FC : A Case Study — KW Jamieson
Can't see it, he can't afford the daily running of the clubCould he afford to ?
He can in the interim, thanks to a US cash injection.Can't see it, he can't afford the daily running of the club
Hell's bells!This is a good starting point Falkirk FC : A Case Study — KW Jamieson
I agree with the sentiment in this post, but you can only make a huge loss, if you have put a huge amount of money into buying a company, Donald never put a huge amount in, so therefore can’t have a huge lossThis. There's obviously 3 options for Donald. The one he wants is to sell now for his ridiculous asking price, which simply won't happen. His worst option is to sell now for what it's worth, because he'll make a huge loss. I imagine he'll be very tempted by a deal that gets him some money now to limit his losses, but which keeps him a decent share so that he can get a higher return if the next person manages to help get us up. Not ideal for him but a decent middle of the road option. I don't doubt for a minute that he'd rather take that option with the wrong person than accept the loss by selling in full now to the right person
Hell's bells!
This sounds like someone we shouldn't touch with a very long, thoroughly disinfected bargepole ...
Nope, if you are funding ongoing losses over and above your initial investment, your losses mount.I agree with the sentiment in this post, but you can only make a huge loss, if you have put a huge amount of money into buying a company, Donald never put a huge amount in, so therefore can’t have a huge loss
The bloke is a wrong un little doubt, Donald out, Campbell stay awayHell's bells!
This sounds like someone we shouldn't touch with a very long, thoroughly disinfected bargepole ...
I agree with the sentiment in this post, but you can only make a huge loss, if you have put a huge amount of money into buying a company, Donald never put a huge amount in, so therefore can’t have a huge loss
But we are in a fantastic financial position, haven’t you heard.Nope, if you are funding ongoing losses over and above your initial investment, your losses mount.
I agree I more convinced now we're well and truly cattled.This has got that joker at Bury written all over it. Full of it yet jot got the money to run it.
Let’s think who gives GOM his financial information on what has or hasn’t been spent at Safc or Madrox as he likes to say, last time I spoke to him he was refusing to believe that owner’s weren’t paying back £20.5m until he seen it with his own eyes in this year’s accounts, well it’s funny but I haven’t heard that the newspaper who made the accusation getting sued have youI'm sure I've seen GOM suggest they have, one way or another, spent over £25m. For a start they're meant to have paid £12m to Ellis (over and above the parachute money), I presume that is largely paid now. Then there's the FPP loan. Madrox will eventually have to pay that back, so it's fair to add that to the £12m. That's £21m straight away and I'm sure they've meant to have put other bits in. If the value is now around £12m or less then it would end up a loss for him. GOM will know more about how much he's likely to be in the hole for, but imo he is facing a loss
Let’s think who gives GOM his financial information on what has or hasn’t been spent at Safc or Madrox as he likes to say, last time I spoke to him he was refusing to believe that owner’s weren’t paying back £20.5m until he seen it with his own eyes in this year’s accounts, well it’s funny but I haven’t heard that the newspaper who made the accusation getting sued have you