kildaremackem
Striker
they have put over £10m in (stewart that is plus at least £3m for juan)Have they paid any?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they have put over £10m in (stewart that is plus at least £3m for juan)Have they paid any?
I'm sure they'll find a way to recoup.they have put over £10m in (stewart that is plus at least £3m for juan)
he certainly has a better track record than phillips or ainsworth..and probably than stendel. those are simply facts.The OP said he'd had 2 promotions in 16 years at this level to show how poor a choice he was. This is completely untrue - he's had 2 promotions, 2 play offs and some occasions where he's saved clubs from relegation in about 6 or 7 seasons at this level. Fair enough you can be underwhelmed but when you start to make things up and basically lie about his managerial achievements as the OP has you totally negate the point you are making. Not one of the managers linked could be labelled as a safe bet for promotion and I'm not sure who has said this. Reading Donald's press release he didn't say was a safe bet for promotion just that he had a good track record, which I think, compared to the others linked, he has. Who said that he's 'a safe bet for promotion'?
im sure..as the next owner will want to as well..I'm sure they'll find a way to recoup.
I presume they've paid something otherwise Short would be up in armsHave they paid any?
Stendel didn't win promotion from this league? I need to go to the doctors.
I presume they've paid something otherwise Short would be up in arms
someone has been paying because the lcub is losing money yet has no external debt...someon has funded the losses and player purchases..
I don't doubt they have paid something. Where it came from is another matter.I presume they've paid something otherwise Short would be up in arms
whre do you think it could have come from? the club has no external debt.?I don't doubt they have paid something. Where it came from is another matter.
whre do you think it could have come from? the club has no external debt.?
the external debt was cleared with the para money..after ellis took a loan from SBC to create it..and who is the reason behind there being no debt?
Look marra, I don't trust them. Their one season gamble didn't work. They used money belonging to the club to pay Short. I don't wish them ill. I've never threatened anyone. I just want the best for my club.whre do you think it could have come from? the club has no external debt.?
they didnt use money belonging to th club to pay short. they used it to pay SBC..that is, to clear a club debt. excpet for £10m that went to short..and has been repaid back into the club.Look marra, I don't trust them. Their one season gamble didn't work. They used money belonging to the club to pay Short. I don't wish them ill. I've never threatene anyone. I just want the best for my club.
It does seem that when Donald goes quiet you reappear.
So you say.they didnt use money belonging to th club to pay short. they used it to pay SBC..that is, to clear a club debt. excpet for £10m that went to short..and has been repaid back into the club.
they work for free at safc every day..while most chairman and directors take a wage.they have fucked some stuff up royally..but the lies on here are revolting. they were offered the chance to port the debt, which would instantly havd made them very rich, that is, on day one, and chose not to, thats what makes me trust them..they turned down an immediate fortune.
they never intended to sell after one season and leave..as evidenced by the fact they tunred down the chance to do it repreatedly.
I’m amazed at Parkinson getting battered already.
He’s been here a few days, yes we were dog shit yesterday, same as we were prev games.
Give him time to get a system going and confidence in his players, he may have to get them fit first.
His first view of his team in action yesterday will have have shown him what’s wrong and who is being carried.
Some on here would have sacked him at half time.
the owners who the fuck else!So you say.
The 10m that went to short has been paid back into the club? From who?
the owners who the fuck else!
it is. it was in the times article revealing the potential investment by MSD...people just read what suits their agenda..the article said he dd the inital £5m to ellis..which we knew and "more than twice that since then"you know a little too much for my liking, none of this information seems to be public knowledge.
He was getting a battering before we even knew he was being picked for the job. It started when fans heard he was one of five shortlisted and hasn't abated. He's here now so we need to give him time as he won't be leaving any time soon but the battering isn't a recent thing and hardly surprising when so many fans were so vehemently against his appointment. Giving him the job was always going to be a risk, his style of football certainly won't help him either
If the owners had any sense they'd have listened and responded to the fan reaction by retracting the job offer. You can't imagine for a moment they didn't see/hear the criticisms and very justifiable frustration which was almost unanimous.
Makes the idea it was given to him solely based on the fact he was the cheapest option all the more believable.
they cant deode what to do based on the reactio n of fans..many of whom are making stuffup about paerkinson anyway!If the owners had any sense they'd have listened and responded to the fan reaction by retracting the job offer. You can't imagine for a moment they didn't see/hear the criticisms and very justifiable frustration which was almost unanimous.
Makes the idea it was given to him solely based on the fact he was the cheapest option all the more believable.
spoent on footballers...where was this transfer budget in the summer they said we would have?
they cant deode what to do based on the reactio n of fans..many of whom are making stuffup about paerkinson anyway!