Melbourne terror attack

There are plenty threads on this board where the subject title is changed. This thread has been "terror" attack, even though it was announced fairly quickly that it wasn't a terrorist attack. Any mods online fancy changing to reflect that actual position?
 


Apparently it's not a terror attack because the bloke who did it is mental.
Not sure how that works but there you go
We've already had the claim on this thread that "A Pakistani cannot have a f***ing car crash now without it being called out as terrorism by Sky News and the Express", but it seems the claim that it wasn't terrorist related proves the opposite. How it could be claimed it wasn't terrorism so soon after the incident yesterday, I don't know.

It seems the picture is now changing:

He had "attributed his actions to perceived mistreatment of Muslims", said a senior officer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/42451576
 
We've already had the claim on this thread that "A Pakistani cannot have a f***ing car crash now without it being called out as terrorism by Sky News and the Express", but it seems the claim that it wasn't terrorist related proves the opposite. How it could be claimed it wasn't terrorism so soon after the incident yesterday, I don't know.

Must've missed that.
 
We've already had the claim on this thread that "A Pakistani cannot have a f***ing car crash now without it being called out as terrorism by Sky News and the Express", but it seems the claim that it wasn't terrorist related proves the opposite. How it could be claimed it wasn't terrorism so soon after the incident yesterday, I don't know.

It seems the picture is now changing:

He had "attributed his actions to perceived mistreatment of Muslims", said a senior officer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/42451576

This was an attack by a Muslim against westerners. It's as simple as that.
 
We've already had the claim on this thread that "A Pakistani cannot have a f***ing car crash now without it being called out as terrorism by Sky News and the Express", but it seems the claim that it wasn't terrorist related proves the opposite. How it could be claimed it wasn't terrorism so soon after the incident yesterday, I don't know.

It seems the picture is now changing:

He had "attributed his actions to PERCEIVED mistreatment of Muslims", said a senior officer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/42451576

That's the problem with all the in-breeding in muslim communities, mental illness is rife.
 
There are plenty threads on this board where the subject title is changed. This thread has been "terror" attack, even though it was announced fairly quickly that it wasn't a terrorist attack. Any mods online fancy changing to reflect that actual position?

Sorry mate. Doesn't fit with the narrative.

This was an attack by a Muslim against westerners. It's as simple as that.

Was it? Is it that simple? Or are you describing yourself.
 

Back
Top