• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Mayenda discussion thread


allmagsaretossas said:
He's just not very good m8 . That run through on goal yesterday was awful he may as well of just passed it to the keeper to save his energy . Didn't even get a shot away being clean through was the most frightening thing about it . This is our back up striker if Wilson gets injured
Click to expand...
Tonysafc said:
He never hides but he's not good enough for us and we need better in Jan if possible
Click to expand...

The Hesk said:
I thought he was poor yesterday especially first half. His first touch is extremely bad for a professional footballer. He would be nowhere near the starting 11 for me
Click to expand...
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Father Larry Duff said:
He can easily play deeper in the 10 role behind Wilson. Dangerous as fuck when he drops and turns then runs at the defence
Click to expand...

He’s brilliant there. Collects it a little deeper on the half turn, then he can go himself or look for Wilson making his run.

If we can start playing them together I genuinely think that could be the difference in promotion (in the playoffs like). They terrify teams with their pace and movement.
 
That little dribble and then outside of the foot pass to Isidor towards the end was incredible. Strength, pace, dribbling, passing, precision, flair. All top.
 
I think he’s better than Isidor. His all round game is better just Isidor is better at finishing. If I was the manager of Sunderland I would start with Mayenda
 
CraigyLee said:
He’s not better than Isidor like
Click to expand...
I think he is. Played half the amount of minutes than Isidor and has about the same amount of game involvements plus he’s missed about 5 really good chances. Gets involved much more in the game. Better first touch , works harder, links play up miles better.
 
wearsidemicky said:
I think he is. Played half the amount of minutes than Isidor and has about the same amount of game involvements plus he’s missed about 5 really good chances. Gets involved much more in the game. Better first touch , works harder, links play up miles better.
Click to expand...
Missing 5 really good chances doesn’t really prove the point well mind Michael :lol:
 
chunkyshanhawk53 said:
Missing 5 really good chances doesn’t really prove the point well mind Michael :lol:
Click to expand...
Well it does. I’m happy for strikers to miss chances. It’s when they don’t get chances throughout the game is the worry. Mayenda weather he plays good or bad will always get at least 1 or 2 really good chances because of how he plays. Isidor before Stoke away was bang average I thought. Scored a few wonder goals but all round game was really poor
 
wearsidemicky said:
Well it does. I’m happy for strikers to miss chances. It’s when they don’t get chances throughout the game is the worry. Mayenda weather he plays good or bad will always get at least 1 or 2 really good chances because of how he plays. Isidor before Stoke away was bang average I thought. Scored a few wonder goals but all round game was really poor
Click to expand...
I mean, I get the point about missing chances. But it’s still not a great thing
 
He seems to get stronger as the game goes on as well and defenders start to tire. Was beating the defenders with ease in the last 15/20 mins.
 
He makes things happen. Unnerves defenders and they panic. If he could improve his ball control he'd be a top player. Hasn't got the skill of Isidor, but he's just as effective. He's still a young un and could still turn out to be as good if not better than the others.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top