Rip Van Fish
Striker
And Steve DeanProbably happy clapping wankers like Bob Stokoe's Hat are allowed to go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And Steve DeanProbably happy clapping wankers like Bob Stokoe's Hat are allowed to go.
Just say your going and then pull out for physcological reasons like Rodwell and pretend you are scared of seats and tableclothes.
I think the difference being Ashley has had Newcastle making a profit season after season whereas we've hemoraged money.
Imagine listening to Grayson whittle on all night. He'd put an insomniac to sleep.
Good album title.Canapés and platitudes.
Didn’t they make a similar profit to us in the transfer market last summer?He's still put around £260m in total into the club, writing debt off and NUFC owe Ashley or companies owned by Ashley around £129m. The difference is that he gambled last season and won and will probably get ALL his money back on sale of the club. Short gambled in a different way and his "investment" is currently largely worthless.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/spor...-ashley-wedded-newcastle-uniteds-11146278.amp
Isn't he getting mixed up with that boy's footy club dinner?First I have heard of that
How rude!Probably happy clapping wankers like Bob Stokoe's Hat are allowed to go.
Didn’t they make a similar profit to us in the transfer market last summer?
Probably made a loss as will we more than likely, £6m instead of £100m where are those figures coming from?But factor in that they got £6m instead of £100m TV money (plus the parachute payment) and had no relegation clause. You'd imagine they made a loss during their promotion season.
Isn't he getting mixed up with that boy's footy club dinner?
Probably made a loss as will we more than likely, £6m instead of £100m where are those figures coming from?
I think they were fortunate (or very good) in getting huge fees for Sissoko in particular. They also had a few high earners who they managed to move out/release people like Cisee, Tiote, Coloccini, helps they hadn't been making losses every year in the Premier league as well.
TV money for the relegation season is £94m versus £73m when they were relegated.TV money for the relegation season and the TV money they made last season (and that £6m was the highest in the Championship)
Our wage bill has been absolutely slashed...at least halved, and probably more whereas theirs was the highest ever recorded in the Championship....said to be over £75m and this was only possible because the owner put another £33m into the club via an interest free loan.
Free bar.
TV money for the relegation season is £94m versus £73m when they were relegated.
It remains to be seen what if anything our owner or there owner put in and how. For what it's worth I think you are broadly right, they took a bit more of a risk although from a stronger starting point although the gap probably isn't as big as it appears.
That’s the tv money newcastle got the year they were relegated.Where do you get the £73m figure?
That’s the tv money newcastle got the year they were relegated.