danbob
Striker
You know that's not what I was saying. What I am saying though is that scientists with views that seem to go wildly against the consensus are often wrong. Sometimes dangerously so.
Sometimes of course they're right all along and the scientific community that kept them down have egg on their face.
I suspect the former but maybe you're right. Maybe Piers is right. Piers says that there's no evidence CO2 causes climate change.
The overwhelming consensus is that it does.
I think he actually says CO2 is a result of, and not a cause. No idea if he's correct, he seems as mad as a box of frogs, but Al Gore strikes me as someone who's only doing this to make money. He doesn't seem to worry about his carbon footprint when he's jetting around the world.