• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Ched Evans...

Status
Not open for further replies.
flanny1 said:
Some bizarre opinions on this thread, he was found not guilty, anyone holding a false conviction against him needs to give their head a shake.

If he is the best striker we can get over the line then we should get him and get behind him.
Click to expand...
Not guilty isnt the same as innocent mate.

He broke into someone's room without their permission, while they were pissed, and had sex with them. Those are facts.

He may have been found not guilty, but that's playing it pretty close.
 

The Cabbage said:
No marra. You still haven’t read the article I posted have you? Anyone who says he is innocent is wrong. That is a fact. Anyone who says she lied is wrong. That is also a fact. It is also a fact that they couldn’t find him guilt at the second trial. None of those facts preclude him being a dirty bastard. And none of them prove that he didn’t do what they said he did. I’m very glad that he’ll never play for Sunderland.
Click to expand...

Well no, of course not .... I'm not setting myself up for an endless cycle of semantics and second guessing based on crap articles.

The court has made it's decision and, without having access to all of the evidence, I'm not conceited enough to doubt them.

If you prefer articles in The Sun, or whatever, to the actual evidence that's your choice.
 
The Cabbage said:
No marra. You still haven’t read the article I posted have you? Anyone who says he is innocent is wrong. That is a fact. Anyone who says she lied is wrong. That is also a fact. It is also a fact that they couldn’t find him guilt at the second trial. None of those facts preclude him being a dirty bastard. And none of them prove that he didn’t do what they said he did. I’m very glad that he’ll never play for Sunderland.
Click to expand...

Some men on here will just hear what they want to hear. No point in arguing with them.
A collective sigh of relief, that he isn't our problem.
 
Reiver said:
Well no, of course not .... I'm not setting myself up for an endless cycle of semantics and second guessing based on crap articles.

The court has made it's decision and, without having access to all of the evidence, I'm not conceited enough to doubt them.

If you prefer articles in The Sun, or whatever, to the actual evidence that's your choice.
Click to expand...
The article was an analysis by a legal professional who had looked at the evidence. Considering some of the things you’ve said in the thread, you’d do well to educate yourself of it Rivs.
 
The Cabbage said:
Thats absolute nonsense Rivs. I suggest you read the link below as it shows very clearly what happened in a way that removed from the tabloid sensationalism. Nothing about his not guilty verdict tells me he’s anything other than a wrong’un

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Good read that, ta.
 
The Cabbage said:
The article was an analysis by a legal professional who had looked at the evidence.

Considering some of the things you’ve said in the thread, you’d do well to educate yourself of it Rivs.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'll spend a few hours examining all the evidence :lol:

Edit: Just had a quick look at the link and it's absolute shite tbh, just loads of technical jargon and very little to do with the actual evidence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Far Tibetan Mountain said:
Not guilty isnt the same as innocent mate.

He broke into someone's room without their permission, while they were pissed, and had sex with them. Those are facts.

He may have been found not guilty, but that's playing it pretty close.
Click to expand...
I get the difference but at what point do you draw the line? If you don’t give those found not guilty the benefit of the doubt then you’re judging people simply by being accused of a crime.
 
The Muffin Man said:
So not only did he spend time in jail for something he didnt do he should be punished again by us not giving him a job because of something he didnt do.

Some crackpots in this place mind.
Click to expand...

If I’m a crackpot for not liking this fella than so be it.

Maybe I just have different morals to you, but regardless I’ll still not go down the personal insult route.

You must be logged on to see external links


Anyway we aren’t getting him apparently so we can avoid the the negativity and divicivness he would have brought whether people like it or not.
 
A surprising number of lasses coming out in defence of Evans on social media. While I accept he was found not guilty in a court of law he did act a bit creepy tbf and lasses never usually wait for an excuse to highlight creepy acts of behaviour from some lads.

Anyway, the poster that said we're talking about this over his footballing ability suggests we shouldn't even be entertaining his signature from purely a footballing PoV.
 
TopCat said:
700 posts , 36 pages of outrage and bed wetting for a player we were never in for :lol:

Some people on here never learn....
Click to expand...

It's just a bit of fun though isn't it ..... like commenting, to strangers, about a match you're not actually at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top