Carse before Raine?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean in the batting line up for for actually playing. If the first then I think so, but if the last then not for me. Raine, top wicket taker last season, dependable and durable.Carse before Raine?
that was my thought...
wonder what the order would be
Lees
Borthwick
Clark
Beddingham
Ackerman
Robinson
Raine
Carse
Potts
Parkinson
Boland
In the batting line up. I regard Carse as a batting all-rounder nowadays, with apologies to Baz McCullum. Raine exactly as you describe him.You mean in the batting line up for for actually playing. If the first then I think so, but if the last then not for me. Raine, top wicket taker last season, dependable and durable.
Looks like Warwickshire have recalled Craig Miles early from his month's loan to Glamorgan. Miles of course was signed on a 2 match loan for us in June of last year and took 5 wickets in the drawn game at the Riverside against Glamorgan but picked up an injury and didn't play in the next game at Leics.Mark Robinson names 13-player squad to face Durham.
Squad
Ed Barnard
Chris Benjamin
Jacob Bethell
Danny Briggs
Michael Burgess (wk)
Alex Davies (C)
Olly Hannon-Dalby
Craig Miles
Dan Mousley
Will Rhodes
Chris Rushworth
Che Simmons
Rob Yates
I think you’re overthinking it.
Ben Stokes is the biggest name in county cricket, one of the biggest hitters, responsible largely for the current aggressive play by the England side and has made himself available for county duty. It’s the most obvious example to use whilst making the point he’s making.
He’s an excellent cricket journalist and the entire game would be a much better place if MORE were like him.
He also spoke VERY well in the defence of Durham following FTECB’s rape and pillaging of us back in 2016.
What is it that you dislike about his cricket opinion?
I hate how they release the team in alphabetical order.
CheersHe’s not anymore, every time England lose he uses to tell me how it’s because county cricket is fucked
Hes Extremely extremely negative
He’s not anymore, every time England lose he uses to tell me how it’s because county cricket is fucked
That must’ve past me by, any links?
I can see why he never made it to the nationals.
I’d argue that’s because he doesn’t toe the party line. Which is a good trait for a journalist.
Yeh,opinions. Personally I find Liew(Guardian) and Berry(Telegraph) lazy journalists,often factually incorrect showing little research. Atherton is a quality writer but won't rock the boat and criticise the establishment. Dobell is prepared to do this which is why I respect him.Not for me, I think that cricket journalism in this country is outstanding, the lads work tele for the times, telegraph and guardian are brilliant
Dobell has a chip on his shoulder and is too negative about things, very much I told you so merchant. He agreed with his mate Giles when he was sacked from England that we’d have no success unless we ripped up the county schedule etc, then has nothing to offer when stokes n McCollum proved him wrong. He was ready to pounce every time we lost v India or Oz.
You need journalists like this maybe for sure but I just don’t enjoy reading his stuff personally.
Again it’s just opinions
Yeh,opinions. Personally I find Liew(Guardian) and Berry(Telegraph) lazy journalists,often factually incorrect showing little research. Atherton is a quality writer but won't rock the boat and criticise the establishment. Dobell does this which is why I respect him.
Yes and Dobell promoted Rafiq's claims and put over a very one sided view on the issue throughout.Liew is poor yeah. He’s a general sports journal, Ali Martin at guardian is good
I donr agree on athers actually, I think he’s fair and criticises both sides, and does not write controversy just to make publicity. I don’t want to go into it again but he was the only national journalist who have balance in the Yorkshire, Rafiq story, and called out the MPs and the ECB for some of the over the top stuff they were doing around it. Which wasn’t an easy thing to do considering the mood and pile on at the time.
Again it’s just about who you enjoy reading isn’t it, no right or wrong. Am Not gonna tell anyone how to think haha.
Yes and Dobell promoted Rafiq's claims and put over a very one sided view on the issue throughout.