• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC :: Middlesex v Durham


brandon said:
Is the stream blurry for anyone else this morning?


I’ve no idea. I always assumed it was personal preference per batsman.
Click to expand...

I think maybe the coach or captain should have intervened when we went 2 down!

Re: stream, no. Its a bandwidth thing, I often get it when the kids are on the internet. Click the settings cog and set the quality to 480 or 720p or the minimum quality you can put up with. You might get some buffering instead.
 
smoker said:
I think maybe the coach or captain should have intervened when we went 2 down!
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t disagree with that, but hindsight is in play a little with this one.

Onto today, 45 minutes of fairly serene batting - but I would like Borthwick to put that late cut shot of his away for a little while…
-
Nice trio of landmarks passed there.

Borthwick 51* from 79 balls with 10 fours.
50 partnership.
Durham lead.

Ha’way!
 
Last edited:
KGC83 said:
That’s right because you have never called anything incorrectly.

You do this on every thread looking for confrontation.
Click to expand...
People like to mention me and how my opinions so why not the other way around, like people tagging me saying I said Potts was shit which I never btw
 
brandon said:
I wouldn’t disagree with that, but hindsight is in play a little with this one.
Click to expand...

Nightwatchman isn't a fringe theory. Every team we've played this season used one, and invariably after the first wicket not the third.
KGC83 said:
That’s right because you have never called anything incorrectly.

You do this on every thread looking for confrontation.
Click to expand...

He doesn't even follow the matches.

He argued Potts and Trevaskis weren't first xi quality most of last season.
 
Last edited:
smoker said:
Nightwatchman isn't a fringe theory. Every team we've played this season used one, and invariably after the first wicket not the third.


He doesn't even follow the matches.

He argued Potts and Trevaskis weren't first xi quality most of last season.
Click to expand...
Changing the argument you said I called Potts shit I didn't trevaskis wasn't good when played in four day cricket, you thought borthwick should be dropped you have had a nightmare you were also slagging Peterson after 2 innings.
 
.Oh FFS. Stokes out for a duck.

They can't handle Roland Jones.

And that's how you do a bowling change Scotty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top