BBC Brobbey should have been sent off v Spurs - panel

[DrewC]

Spurs fans will be lapping this up with their conspiracies

Still going down lose to Wolves reality will set in

 

[chunkyshanhawk53]

SAFCartel

Stolen from someone else

 

[den]

Tottenham were Brobbed

 

[FatDrummer]

From BBC Sport.

Sunderland's Brian Brobbey should have been sent off for two yellow-card offences against Tottenham, a Premier League panel has ruled.

You must be logged on to see external links

Utter f***ing shite.

 

[Lucky1985]

Nope. No chance


They will only review downgrading a yellow not upgrading a potential second yellow

Ah that’s good then. As I could see it leading to a lot more sendings off.

I think in Brobbys case, the ref probably wasn’t certain on either yellow of wrong doing and so he decided not to issue the second yellow, but if VAR are only looking at the second incident in isolation then they may determine it to be worth of a yellow, which I thought would be unfair if the first card isn’t also reviewed and rescinded.

 

[YES WE GYAN]

Kolo Muani dove at least four times so should have been sent off twice. Easy this.

 

[Ch1982]

I said at the time he was lucky, and he was. We got away with that one.

Shite. You penalise the offence not the consequences.

 

[Father Jack Hackett]

He was running full pelt and Romero ran across his path. If he didn’t put his arms out, if would have been him colliding with the keeper - who would have come off a lot worse than he did

 

[Zweiguys]

Doesn’t make any real difference after the fact though.
That ragdoll he threw out of bounds was looking for a reaction and he got one.

 

[HABA87]

The panel are wrong.

 

[ROKER PARK]

You can analyse any match and you will see an instance where a player should have been sent off. If refs and Var did their job. This is without the biggest problem which is around man handling in the box.

 

[pinewaves1868]

that should be a mass resignation notice. f***ing lapping up diving shits.

 

[IAmZlatan]

3:2 so they cant even agree amongst themselves?

Clear and obvious, clearly

 

[HABA87]

Would this even have been a discussion if Romero wasn't injured?

It's utterly bizarre.

 

[JL1985]

Nonsense, they are reacting the Romero’s injury rather than the actual ‘foul.

 

[Antidotes]

Oh well. They never said out about the red and pen we should have had at Bournemouth away so couldn't care less.

 

[Hawkings Boots]

If Romero hadn't collided with the keeper nothing more would have been said about this

It was barely a foul never mind worthy of a second yellow

 

[HABA87]

If Romero hadn't collided with the keeper nothing more would have been said about this

It was barely a foul never mind worthy of a second yellow

I don't even think it's a foul!

 

[Flavonoids]

What was the panels view on Le fee getting pushed over at Bournemouth? and what is the point of them, and who gives a monkeys ... their view changes nothing, it's just more clickbait shit.

 

[The Great Soprendo]

A 3:2 opinion from the panel proves to me that it doesn't meet the 'clear and obvious' test, apart from anything else. 3:3 if you include the actual ref on the pitch at the time.